Re: [RESEND PATCH v3] mailbox: mtk-cmdq: fix gce timeout issue

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>]

Il 26/09/22 11:02, Yongqiang Niu ha scritto:
> 1. enable gce ddr enable(gce reigster offset 0x48, bit 16 to 18) when gce work,
> and disable gce ddr enable when gce work job done
> 2. split cmdq clk enable/disable api, and control gce ddr enable/disable
> in clk enable/disable function to make sure it could protect when cmdq
> is multiple used by display and mdp
> 
> this is only for some SOC which has flag "control_by_sw".
> for this kind of gce, there is a handshake flow between gce and ddr
> hardware,
> if not set ddr enable flag of gce, ddr will fall into idle mode,
> then gce instructions will not process done.
> we need set this flag of gce to tell ddr when gce is idle or busy
> controlled by software flow.
> 
> ddr problem is a special case.
> when test suspend/resume case, gce sometimes will pull ddr, and ddr can
> not go to suspend.
> if we set gce register 0x48 to 0x7, will fix this gce pull ddr issue,
> as you have referred [1] and [2] (8192 and 8195)
> but for mt8186, the gce is more special, except setting of [1] and [2],
> we need add more setting set gce register 0x48 to (0x7 << 16 | 0x7)
> when gce working to make sure gce could process all instructions ok.
> this case just need normal bootup, if we not set this, display cmdq
> task will timeout, and chrome homescreen will always black screen.
> 
> and with this patch, we have done these test on mt8186:
> 1.suspend/resume
> 2.boot up to home screen
> 3.playback video with youtube.
> 
> suspend issue is special gce hardware issue, gce client  driver
> command already process done, but gce still pull ddr.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
> ---
> change sinc v2:
> 1. add definition GCE_CTRL_BY_SW and GCE_DDR_EN instead of magic number
> ---
> 
> ---
>   drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> index 9465f9081515..bd63773b05fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
>   #define CMDQ_THR_PRIORITY		0x40
>   
>   #define GCE_GCTL_VALUE			0x48
> +#define GCE_CTRL_BY_SW				GENMASK(18, 16)
> +#define GCE_DDR_EN				GENMASK(2, 0)
>   
>   #define CMDQ_THR_ACTIVE_SLOT_CYCLES	0x3200
>   #define CMDQ_THR_ENABLED		0x1
> @@ -80,16 +82,60 @@ struct cmdq {
>   	bool			suspended;
>   	u8			shift_pa;
>   	bool			control_by_sw;
> +	bool			sw_ddr_en;
>   	u32			gce_num;
> +	atomic_t		usage;
> +	spinlock_t		lock;
>   };
>   
>   struct gce_plat {
>   	u32 thread_nr;
>   	u8 shift;
>   	bool control_by_sw;
> +	bool sw_ddr_en;
>   	u32 gce_num;
>   };
>   
> +static s32 cmdq_clk_enable(struct cmdq *cmdq)
> +{
> +	s32 usage, ret;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&cmdq->lock, flags);

All this locking is avoidable on all SoCs where (sw_ddr_en == false), which means
that this is needed only for one SoC (MT8186).

You can solve that by adding a callback pointer on the gce_plat data, so that
we get something like:

static int cmdq_clk_swddr_enable(struct cmdq *cmdq)
{
	lock, atomic_inc, clk_bulk_enable, writel(....);
}

static int cmdq_clk_enable(struct cmdq *cmdq)
{
	return clk_bulk_enable(cmdq->gce_num, cmdq->clocks);
};

static const struct gce_plat gce_plat_v7 = {
	...........
	.clk_enable = cmdq_clk_swddr_enable,
	.clk_disable = cmdq_clk_swddr_disable,
	..........
};

Please care about older SoCs' performance.

Regards,
Angelo