Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/199] 5.10.199-rc2 review

["Daniel Díaz" <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>]

Hello!

On 24/10/23 2:36 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.199 release.
> There are 199 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu, 26 Oct 2023 08:32:45 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.199-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro's test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 5.10.199-rc2
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: e31b6513c43d7f4efa2c5913dd7d4fbef162e736
* git describe: v5.10.198-200-ge31b6513c43d
* test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.198-200-ge31b6513c43d

## No test regressions (compared to v5.10.198)

## No metric regressions (compared to v5.10.198)

## No test fixes (compared to v5.10.198)

## No metric fixes (compared to v5.10.198)

## Test result summary
total: 89095, pass: 69854, fail: 2647, skip: 16533, xfail: 61

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 114 total, 114 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 40 total, 40 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 32 total, 32 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 0 passed, 3 failed
* powerpc: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance


Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@linaro.org

-- 
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org