From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
loongson-kernel@lists.loongnix.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] LoongArch: Move CONFIG_HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA related code to smp.c
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 17:27:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dcf6e475-8219-6b1e-a99b-2cdf1e86289c@loongson.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAhV-H6TVEEB=xdr_ymuUnDqPDXwtM7R7yJBj03YhWpCwqjAiA@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/12/2024 12:12 PM, Huacai Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 9:05 AM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> wrote:
>>
>> Currently, if CONFIG_NUMA is not set but CONFIG_SMP is set, the arch
>> specified setup_per_cpu_areas() in arch/loongarch/kernel/numa.c will
>> not be built and the generic setup_per_cpu_areas() in mm/percpu.c is
>> actually used, this is not reasonable and does not work as intended.
> Why is the generic version not reasonable? We need a custom version
> just because it can put the percpu variable in the best node. If NUMA
> disabled, software can only see one node, how to optimize?
The initial aim is to use the arch specific setup_per_cpu_areas()
in any case under CONFIG_SMP, this patch can be dropped if it is
meaningless for the case of !CONFIG_NUMA and CONFIG_SMP.
Thanks,
Tiezhu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-12 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-11 1:05 [PATCH v3 0/4] Give chance to build under !CONFIG_SMP for LoongArch Tiezhu Yang
2024-04-11 1:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] LoongArch: Move CONFIG_HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA related code to smp.c Tiezhu Yang
2024-04-12 4:12 ` Huacai Chen
2024-04-12 9:27 ` Tiezhu Yang [this message]
2024-04-13 7:20 ` Huacai Chen
2024-04-11 1:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] LoongArch: Refactor get_acpi_id_for_cpu() related code Tiezhu Yang
2024-04-12 4:17 ` Huacai Chen
2024-04-12 9:28 ` Tiezhu Yang
2024-04-11 1:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] LoongArch: Save and restore PERCPU_BASE_KS for ACPI S3 state Tiezhu Yang
2024-04-12 4:18 ` Huacai Chen
2024-04-12 9:30 ` Tiezhu Yang
2024-04-13 7:22 ` Huacai Chen
2024-04-11 1:05 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] LoongArch: Give chance to build under !CONFIG_SMP Tiezhu Yang
2024-04-11 4:26 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Give chance to build under !CONFIG_SMP for LoongArch Huacai Chen
2024-04-11 6:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-04-12 4:00 ` Huacai Chen
2024-04-18 17:44 ` Xi Ruoyao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dcf6e475-8219-6b1e-a99b-2cdf1e86289c@loongson.cn \
--to=yangtiezhu@loongson.cn \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=loongson-kernel@lists.loongnix.cn \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®