Re: [PATCH] regulator: tps65086: Fix 25mV ranges for BUCK regulators

["Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com>]

On 12/01/2016 10:44 AM, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> The BUCK regulators 3, 4, and 5 also have a 10mV step mode,
> adjust the tables and logic to reflect the data-sheet for
> these regulators.
> 
> fixes: d2a2e729a666 ("regulator: tps65086: Add regulator driver for the TPS65086 PMIC")
> Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/tps65086.txt |  2 +-
>  drivers/regulator/tps65086-regulator.c             | 54 +++++++++++-----------
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/tps65086.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/tps65086.txt
> index d370561..9cfa886 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/tps65086.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/tps65086.txt
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ Required properties:
>                              defined below.
>  
>  Optional regulator properties:
> - - ti,regulator-step-size-25mv	: This is applicable for buck[1,2,6], set this
> + - ti,regulator-step-size-25mv	: This is applicable for buck[1-6], set this
>  				    if the regulator is factory set with a 25mv
>  				    step voltage mapping.
>   - ti,regulator-decay		: This is applicable for buck[1-6], set this if
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65086-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps65086-regulator.c
> index 33f389d..caf174f 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/tps65086-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65086-regulator.c
> @@ -71,18 +71,17 @@ struct tps65086_regulator {
>  	unsigned int decay_mask;
>  };
>  
> -static const struct regulator_linear_range tps65086_buck126_10mv_ranges[] = {
> +static const struct regulator_linear_range tps65086_10mv_ranges[] = {
>  	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(0, 0x0, 0x0, 0),
>  	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(410000, 0x1, 0x7F, 10000),
>  };
>  
>  static const struct regulator_linear_range tps65086_buck126_25mv_ranges[] = {

\/\/\/\/\/

> -	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(0, 0x0, 0x0, 0),
> -	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1000000, 0x1, 0x18, 0),
> +	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1000000, 0x0, 0x18, 0),

I just got word that there was a typo in the datasheet, 0x0 really does
map to 0v out, the above change chunk can be dropped. It looks this
patch also just got pulled, should I submit a correction patch or can
this be fixed up locally?

Thanks,
Andrew

>  	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1025000, 0x19, 0x7F, 25000),
>  };
>  
> -static const struct regulator_linear_range tps65086_buck345_ranges[] = {
> +static const struct regulator_linear_range tps65086_buck345_25mv_ranges[] = {
>  	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(0, 0x0, 0x0, 0),
>  	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(425000, 0x1, 0x7F, 25000),
>  };
> @@ -125,27 +124,27 @@ static int tps65086_of_parse_cb(struct device_node *dev,
>  static struct tps65086_regulator regulators[] = {
>  	TPS65086_REGULATOR("BUCK1", "buck1", BUCK1, 0x80, TPS65086_BUCK1CTRL,
>  			   BUCK_VID_MASK, TPS65086_BUCK123CTRL, BIT(0),
> -			   tps65086_buck126_10mv_ranges, TPS65086_BUCK1CTRL,
> +			   tps65086_10mv_ranges, TPS65086_BUCK1CTRL,
>  			   BIT(0)),
>  	TPS65086_REGULATOR("BUCK2", "buck2", BUCK2, 0x80, TPS65086_BUCK2CTRL,
>  			   BUCK_VID_MASK, TPS65086_BUCK123CTRL, BIT(1),
> -			   tps65086_buck126_10mv_ranges, TPS65086_BUCK2CTRL,
> +			   tps65086_10mv_ranges, TPS65086_BUCK2CTRL,
>  			   BIT(0)),
>  	TPS65086_REGULATOR("BUCK3", "buck3", BUCK3, 0x80, TPS65086_BUCK3VID,
>  			   BUCK_VID_MASK, TPS65086_BUCK123CTRL, BIT(2),
> -			   tps65086_buck345_ranges, TPS65086_BUCK3DECAY,
> +			   tps65086_10mv_ranges, TPS65086_BUCK3DECAY,
>  			   BIT(0)),
>  	TPS65086_REGULATOR("BUCK4", "buck4", BUCK4, 0x80, TPS65086_BUCK4VID,
>  			   BUCK_VID_MASK, TPS65086_BUCK4CTRL, BIT(0),
> -			   tps65086_buck345_ranges, TPS65086_BUCK4VID,
> +			   tps65086_10mv_ranges, TPS65086_BUCK4VID,
>  			   BIT(0)),
>  	TPS65086_REGULATOR("BUCK5", "buck5", BUCK5, 0x80, TPS65086_BUCK5VID,
>  			   BUCK_VID_MASK, TPS65086_BUCK5CTRL, BIT(0),
> -			   tps65086_buck345_ranges, TPS65086_BUCK5CTRL,
> +			   tps65086_10mv_ranges, TPS65086_BUCK5CTRL,
>  			   BIT(0)),
>  	TPS65086_REGULATOR("BUCK6", "buck6", BUCK6, 0x80, TPS65086_BUCK6VID,
>  			   BUCK_VID_MASK, TPS65086_BUCK6CTRL, BIT(0),
> -			   tps65086_buck126_10mv_ranges, TPS65086_BUCK6CTRL,
> +			   tps65086_10mv_ranges, TPS65086_BUCK6CTRL,
>  			   BIT(0)),
>  	TPS65086_REGULATOR("LDOA1", "ldoa1", LDOA1, 0xF, TPS65086_LDOA1CTRL,
>  			   VDOA1_VID_MASK, TPS65086_LDOA1CTRL, BIT(0),
> @@ -162,18 +161,6 @@ static struct tps65086_regulator regulators[] = {
>  	TPS65086_SWITCH("VTT", "vtt", VTT, TPS65086_SWVTT_EN, BIT(4)),
>  };
>  
> -static inline bool has_25mv_mode(int id)
> -{
> -	switch (id) {
> -	case BUCK1:
> -	case BUCK2:
> -	case BUCK6:
> -		return true;
> -	default:
> -		return false;
> -	}
> -}
> -
>  static int tps65086_of_parse_cb(struct device_node *dev,
>  				const struct regulator_desc *desc,
>  				struct regulator_config *config)
> @@ -181,12 +168,27 @@ static int tps65086_of_parse_cb(struct device_node *dev,
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	/* Check for 25mV step mode */
> -	if (has_25mv_mode(desc->id) &&
> -			of_property_read_bool(config->of_node, "ti,regulator-step-size-25mv")) {
> -		regulators[desc->id].desc.linear_ranges =
> +	if (of_property_read_bool(config->of_node, "ti,regulator-step-size-25mv")) {
> +		switch (desc->id) {
> +		case BUCK1:
> +		case BUCK2:
> +		case BUCK6:
> +			regulators[desc->id].desc.linear_ranges =
>  				tps65086_buck126_25mv_ranges;
> -		regulators[desc->id].desc.n_linear_ranges =
> +			regulators[desc->id].desc.n_linear_ranges =
>  				ARRAY_SIZE(tps65086_buck126_25mv_ranges);
> +			break;
> +		case BUCK3:
> +		case BUCK4:
> +		case BUCK5:
> +			regulators[desc->id].desc.linear_ranges =
> +				tps65086_buck345_25mv_ranges;
> +			regulators[desc->id].desc.n_linear_ranges =
> +				ARRAY_SIZE(tps65086_buck345_25mv_ranges);
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			dev_warn(config->dev, "25mV step mode only valid for BUCK regulators\n");
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Check for decay mode */
>