mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ashwin-h <ashwinh@vmware.com>
To: <tytso@mit.edu>, <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<stable@kernel.org>, <srivatsab@vmware.com>,
	<srivatsa@csail.mit.edu>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	<srostedt@vmware.com>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	<ashwin.hiranniah@gmail.com>, Ashwin H <ashwinh@vmware.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] ext4: don't perform block validity checks on the journal inode
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:52:05 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd3e2d975dc3c01cfa89466cea5a51a978826a8e.1588189373.git.ashwinh@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1588189373.git.ashwinh@vmware.com>

From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

commit 0a944e8a6c66ca04c7afbaa17e22bf208a8b37f0 upstream.

Since the journal inode is already checked when we added it to the
block validity's system zone, if we check it again, we'll just trigger
a failure.

This was causing failures like this:

[   53.897001] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_find_extent:909: inode
#8: comm jbd2/sda-8: pblk 121667583 bad header/extent: invalid extent entries - magic f30a, entries 8, max 340(340), depth 0(0)
[   53.931430] jbd2_journal_bmap: journal block not found at offset 49 on sda-8
[   53.938480] Aborting journal on device sda-8.

... but only if the system was under enough memory pressure that
logical->physical mapping for the journal inode gets pushed out of the
extent cache.  (This is why it wasn't noticed earlier.)

Fixes: 345c0dbf3a30 ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity")
Reported-by: Dan Rue <dan.rue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ashwin H <ashwinh@vmware.com>
---
 fs/ext4/extents.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index fa6ae90..100eb91 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -530,10 +530,14 @@ __read_extent_tree_block(const char *function, unsigned int line,
 	}
 	if (buffer_verified(bh) && !(flags & EXT4_EX_FORCE_CACHE))
 		return bh;
-	err = __ext4_ext_check(function, line, inode,
-			       ext_block_hdr(bh), depth, pblk);
-	if (err)
-		goto errout;
+	if (!ext4_has_feature_journal(inode->i_sb) ||
+	    (inode->i_ino !=
+	     le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_es->s_journal_inum))) {
+		err = __ext4_ext_check(function, line, inode,
+				       ext_block_hdr(bh), depth, pblk);
+		if (err)
+			goto errout;
+	}
 	set_buffer_verified(bh);
 	/*
 	 * If this is a leaf block, cache all of its entries
-- 
2.7.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-29 20:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-30  4:22 [PATCH 0/5] Backport to 4.14 - ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity ashwin-h
2020-04-30  4:22 ` [PATCH 1/5] ext4: avoid declaring fs inconsistent due to invalid file handles ashwin-h
2020-04-30  4:22 ` [PATCH 2/5] ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity ashwin-h
2020-04-30  4:22 ` ashwin-h [this message]
2020-04-30  4:22 ` [PATCH 4/5] ext4: fix block validity checks for journal inodes using indirect blocks ashwin-h
2020-04-30  4:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] ext4: unsigned int compared against zero ashwin-h
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-04-30  4:35 [PATCH 0/5] Backport to 4.4 - ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity ashwin-h
2020-04-30  4:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] ext4: don't perform block validity checks on the journal inode ashwin-h
2020-04-29 19:21 [PATCH 0/5] Backport to 4.9- ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity ashwin-h
2020-04-29 19:21 ` [PATCH 3/5] ext4: don't perform block validity checks on the journal inode ashwin-h

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dd3e2d975dc3c01cfa89466cea5a51a978826a8e.1588189373.git.ashwinh@vmware.com \
    --to=ashwinh@vmware.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=ashwin.hiranniah@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=srivatsa@csail.mit.edu \
    --cc=srivatsab@vmware.com \
    --cc=srostedt@vmware.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®