From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: David Thomson <dt@linux-mail.net>, jgross@suse.com
Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, olekstysh@gmail.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xen/acpi-processor: fix _CST detection using undersized evaluation buffer
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 10:39:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd450c3c-754f-4b85-94e7-16bc88afc56c@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260224093707.19679-1-dt@linux-mail.net>
On 24.02.2026 10:37, David Thomson wrote:
> read_acpi_id() attempts to evaluate _CST using a stack buffer of
> sizeof(union acpi_object) (48 bytes), but _CST returns a nested Package
> of sub-Packages (one per C-state, each containing a register descriptor,
> type, latency, and power) requiring hundreds of bytes. The evaluation
> always fails with AE_BUFFER_OVERFLOW.
>
> On modern systems using FFH/MWAIT entry (where pblk is zero), this
> causes the function to return before setting the acpi_id_cst_present
> bit. In check_acpi_ids(), flags.power is then zero for all Phase 2 CPUs
> (physical CPUs beyond dom0's vCPU count), so push_cxx_to_hypervisor() is
> never called for them.
>
> On a system with dom0_max_vcpus=2 and 8 physical CPUs, only PCPUs 0-1
> receive C-state data. PCPUs 2-7 are stuck in C0/C1 idle, unable to
> enter C2/C3. This costs measurable wall power (4W observed on an Intel
> Core Ultra 7 265K with Xen 4.20).
>
> The function never uses the _CST return value -- it only needs to know
> whether _CST exists. Replace the broken acpi_evaluate_object() call with
> acpi_has_method(), which correctly detects _CST presence using
> acpi_get_handle() without any buffer allocation. This brings C-state
> detection to parity with the P-state path, which already works correctly
> for Phase 2 CPUs.
>
> Fixes: 59a568029181 ("xen/acpi-processor: C and P-state driver that uploads said data to hypervisor.")
> Signed-off-by: David Thomson <dt@linux-mail.net>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-24 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-24 9:37 David Thomson
2026-02-24 9:39 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2026-03-16 20:03 ` Elliott Mitchell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd450c3c-754f-4b85-94e7-16bc88afc56c@suse.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=dt@linux-mail.net \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olekstysh@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®