From: david singleton <dsingleton@mvista.com>
To: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sven@mvista.com>
Cc: Roy Reichwein <rreichwein@mvista.com>,
robustmutexes@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kevin Morgan <kmorgan@mvista.com>
Subject: Re: Robust Futexes status
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 10:02:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd482d921b104651fc20959ad4acf161@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1130125681.5296.5.camel@imap.mvista.com>
On Oct 23, 2005, at 8:48 PM, Sven-Thorsten Dietrich wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-10-23 at 13:52 -0700, david singleton wrote:
>> Inaky Perez-Gonzalez has a wonderful suite of performance, stress
>> and
>> functionality tests for the fusyn pthreads mutex package.
>
>> The graphs are just to show relative performance for the different
>> flavor kernels. The
>> kernel's perform quite closely regardless of the 'flavor' of kernel.
>> The kernels have quite a few
>> debugging options turned so I can look for any problems so performance
>> is not optimal.
>>
>
> The Mutex ownership change seems to climb with waiting threads.
>
> Its hard to tell with the log-n X-axis scale, but does this possibly
> correlate to the deadlock-detect option?
It could be. I have been running all the tests mainly as stress and
functionality tests.
>
> If Deadlock-detect is enabled we should be seeing a graph proportional
> to n-squared on a linear X axis.
>
> If deadlock detect is disabled, the wait time should plateau for very
> large N.
The original run script ran up to 7500 waiting threads. I ran a version
that only went up to 400 threads.
When I get full performance data I'll post it.
David
>
> Sven
>
>
>> It appears the robust futex functionality is healthy in all flavors
>> of
>> kernel.
>>
>>
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> ***********************************
> Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
> Real-Time Software Architect
> MontaVista Software, Inc.
> 1237 East Arques Ave.
> Sunnyvale, CA 94085
>
> Phone: 408.992.4515
> Fax: 408.328.9204
>
> http://www.mvista.com
> Platform To Innovate
> ***********************************
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-24 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-23 20:52 david singleton
2005-10-24 3:48 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-10-24 17:02 ` david singleton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd482d921b104651fc20959ad4acf161@mvista.com \
--to=dsingleton@mvista.com \
--cc=kmorgan@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robustmutexes@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=rreichwein@mvista.com \
--cc=sven@mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®