mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	joro@8bytes.org, kevin.tian@intel.com
Cc: will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com,
	jgg@nvidia.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rc v2] iommu: Fix nested pci_dev_reset_iommu_prepare/done()
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 19:14:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd72f3be-16d9-4386-82ac-1b8e06186e3d@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260319043135.1153534-1-nicolinc@nvidia.com>



On 3/19/26 12:31 PM, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> Shuai found that cxl_reset_bus_function() calls pci_reset_bus_function()
> internally while both are calling pci_dev_reset_iommu_prepare/done().
> 
> As pci_dev_reset_iommu_prepare() doesn't support re-entry, the inner call
> will trigger a WARN_ON and return -EBUSY, resulting in failing the entire
> device reset.
> 
> On the other hand, removing the outer calls in the PCI callers is unsafe.
> As pointed out by Kevin, device-specific quirks like reset_hinic_vf_dev()
> execute custom firmware waits after their inner pcie_flr() completes. If
> the IOMMU protection relies solely on the inner reset, the IOMMU will be
> unblocked prematurely while the device is still resetting.
> 
> Instead, fix this by making pci_dev_reset_iommu_prepare/done() reentrant.
> 
> Introduce a 'reset_cnt' in struct iommu_group. Safely increment/decrement
> the reference counter in the nested calls, ensuring the IOMMU domains are
> only restored when the outermost reset finally completes.
> 
> Fixes: c279e83953d9 ("iommu: Introduce pci_dev_reset_iommu_prepare/done()")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/absKsk7qQOwzhpzv@Asurada-Nvidia/
> Suggested-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> ---
> Changelog
>   v2:
>   * Fix in the helpers by allowing re-entry
>   v1:
>   https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260318220028.1146905-1-nicolinc@nvidia.com/
> 
>   drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index 35db51780954..16155097b27c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ struct iommu_group {
>   	struct iommu_domain *resetting_domain;
>   	struct iommu_domain *domain;
>   	struct list_head entry;
> +	unsigned int reset_cnt;


Nit: consider renaming reset_cnt to reset_depth or
reset_nesting to better convey that this tracks nesting level,
not a count of total resets.

>   	unsigned int owner_cnt;
>   	void *owner;
>   };
> @@ -3961,9 +3962,10 @@ int pci_dev_reset_iommu_prepare(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>   
>   	guard(mutex)(&group->mutex);
>   
> -	/* Re-entry is not allowed */
> -	if (WARN_ON(group->resetting_domain))
> -		return -EBUSY;
> +	if (group->resetting_domain) {
> +		group->reset_cnt++;
> +		return 0;
> +	}
>   
>   	ret = __iommu_group_alloc_blocking_domain(group);

pci_dev_reset_iommu_prepare/done() have NO singleton group check.
They operate on the specific pdev passed in, but use group-wide
state (resetting_domain, reset_cnt) to track the reset lifecycle.

Interestingly, the broken_worker in patch 3 of the ATC timeout
series DOES have an explicit singleton check:

   if (list_is_singular(&group->devices)) {
       /* Note: only support group with a single device */

This reveals an implicit assumption: the entire prepare/done
mechanism works correctly only for singleton groups. For
multi-device groups:

   - prepare() only detaches the specific pdev, leaving other
     devices in the group still attached to the original domain
   - The group-wide resetting_domain/reset_cnt state can be
     corrupted by concurrent resets on different devices (as
     discussed above)

If prepare/done is truly meant only for singleton groups, it
should enforce this explicitly:

   if (!list_is_singular(&group->devices))
       return -EOPNOTSUPP;

If it's meant to support multi-device groups, then the per-device
vs group-wide state mismatch needs to be resolved — either by
making the state per-device, or by detaching/restoring all
devices in the group together.


Thanks.
Shuai



  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-19 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-19  4:31 Nicolin Chen
2026-03-19 11:14 ` Shuai Xue [this message]
2026-03-19 21:34   ` Nicolin Chen
2026-03-27  8:27     ` Tian, Kevin
2026-03-27 21:08       ` Nicolin Chen
2026-03-31  7:12         ` Tian, Kevin
2026-03-31 12:23           ` Nicolin Chen
2026-04-01  8:14             ` Tian, Kevin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dd72f3be-16d9-4386-82ac-1b8e06186e3d@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome