From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: Build regressions/improvements in v6.4 (wireless/airo)
Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2023 06:26:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd993aaa-5481-b621-9009-d02f9e449f98@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdX4xVkdViy1Eq7N43uD_iWp3yS6qkiCbp9+frLHsTA_fg@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/9/23 06:23, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
> On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 3:12 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>> On 7/9/23 01:27, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 4:46 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>>>> On 6/26/23 01:24, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 26 Jun 2023, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>>>> JFYI, when comparing v6.4[1] to v6.4-rc7[3], the summaries are:
>>>>>> - build errors: +1/-0
>>>>>
>>>>> + /kisskb/src/drivers/net/wireless/cisco/airo.c: error: 'status_rid.currentXmitRate' is used uninitialized [-Werror=uninitialized]: => 6163:45
>>>>
>>>> I cannot reproduce this build error. (I don't doubt the problem, just having a problem
>>>> making it happen for me.)
>>>> I have tried it with gcc-11.1.0, gcc-11.3.0, and gcc-13.1.0.
>>>
>>> Which is similar to kisskb, using sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.3.0...
>>>
>>>> I'm surprised that this is the only instance that gcc found/warned about.
>>>
>>> Indeed.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have a patch for this one instance, but there are 40+ instances of
>>>> readStatusRid()
>>>> readConfigRid()
>>>> readSsidRid()
>>>> readStatsRid()
>>>> readCapabilityRid()
>>>> that don't check the return status of the function calls.
>>>>
>>>> I suppose that a patch can quieten the compiler error/warning, but given
>>>> the 40+ other problems, it won't make the driver any noticeably better IMO.
>>>
>>> Indeed...
>>>
>>>>> sh4-gcc11/sh-allmodconfig
>>>>> seen before
>>>>>
>>>>> This is actually a real issue, and it's been here since basically forever.
>>>>>
>>>>> drivers/net/wireless/cisco/airo.c:
>>>>>
>>>>> static int airo_get_rate(struct net_device *dev,
>>>>> struct iw_request_info *info,
>>>>> union iwreq_data *wrqu,
>>>>> char *extra)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct iw_param *vwrq = &wrqu->bitrate;
>>>>> struct airo_info *local = dev->ml_priv;
>>>>> StatusRid status_rid; /* Card status info */
>>>>>
>>>>> readStatusRid(local, &status_rid, 1);
>>>>>
>>>>> ==> vwrq->value = le16_to_cpu(status_rid.currentXmitRate) * 500000;
>>>>> ...
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> static int readStatusRid(struct airo_info *ai, StatusRid *statr, int lock)
>>>>> {
>>>>> return PC4500_readrid(ai, RID_STATUS, statr, sizeof(*statr), lock);
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> static int PC4500_readrid(struct airo_info *ai, u16 rid, void *pBuf, int len, int lock)
>>>>> {
>>>>> u16 status;
>>>>> int rc = SUCCESS;
>>>>>
>>>>> if (lock) {
>>>>> if (down_interruptible(&ai->sem))
>>>>> return ERROR;
>>>>>
>>>>> pBuf output buffer contents not initialized.
>>>>>
>>>>> }
>>>>> ...
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/linus/head/6995e2de6891c724bfeb2db33d7b87775f913ad1/ (all 160 configs)
>>>>>> [3] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/linus/head/45a3e24f65e90a047bef86f927ebdc4c710edaa1/ (all 160 configs)
>>>>
>>>> I appreciate the synopsis. Here's a patch. WDYT?
>>>> ---
>>>> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] wifi: airo: avoid uninitialized warning in airo_get_rate()
>>>>
>>>> Quieten a gcc (11.3.0) build error or warning by checking the function
>>>> call status and returning -EIO if the function call failed.
>>>> This is similar to what several other wireless drivers do for the
>>>> SIOCGIWRATE ioctl call.
>>>>
>>>> drivers/net/wireless/cisco/airo.c: error: 'status_rid.currentXmitRate' is used uninitialized [-Werror=uninitialized]
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
>>>> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
>>>> Link: lore.kernel.org/r/39abf2c7-24a-f167-91da-ed4c5435d1c4@linux-m68k.org
>>>> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
>>>> Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/net/wireless/cisco/airo.c | 5 ++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff -- a/drivers/net/wireless/cisco/airo.c b/drivers/net/wireless/cisco/airo.c
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/cisco/airo.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/cisco/airo.c
>>>> @@ -6157,8 +6157,11 @@ static int airo_get_rate(struct net_devi
>>>> struct iw_param *vwrq = &wrqu->bitrate;
>>>> struct airo_info *local = dev->ml_priv;
>>>> StatusRid status_rid; /* Card status info */
>>>> + int ret;
>>>>
>>>> - readStatusRid(local, &status_rid, 1);
>>>> + ret = readStatusRid(local, &status_rid, 1);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + return -EIO;
>>>
>>> That's about the best we can do without further surgery.
>>> E.g. PC4500_readrid() should return a proper error code instead of
>>> just ERROR/SUCCESS.
>>> The case gcc complains about is when lock = 1 and the call to
>>> down_interruptible() fails, for which -EBUSY would be appropriate.
>>
>> Yes, I saw that return value as one of the options.
>> I'll change it to that and submit it.
>
> Unfortunately that is not the only possible failure mode.
> But it is the one where gcc can _prove_ the output buffer is not initialized ;-)
>
> OMG, PC4500_readrid() can also read from the passed buffer...
Yes, such messy fun. :(
--
~Randy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-09 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-25 23:40 Linux 6.4 Linus Torvalds
2023-06-26 5:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-06-26 8:19 ` Build regressions/improvements in v6.4 Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-06-26 8:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-07-09 2:45 ` Build regressions/improvements in v6.4 (wireless/airo) Randy Dunlap
2023-07-09 7:38 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-07-09 13:09 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-07-09 8:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-07-09 13:12 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-07-09 13:23 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-07-09 13:26 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd993aaa-5481-b621-9009-d02f9e449f98@infradead.org \
--to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®