From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933465AbdEOIkf (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 May 2017 04:40:35 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:57503 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933328AbdEOIkc (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 May 2017 04:40:32 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] regulator: lp8755: fix spelling mistake "acceess" -> "access" To: Mark Brown References: <20170510083020.27600-1-colin.king@canonical.com> <20170514092551.kpqm5c3em5p52wri@sirena.org.uk> Cc: Liam Girdwood , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Colin Ian King Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 09:40:29 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170514092551.kpqm5c3em5p52wri@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WULnlhxwVlRL9uqJdIpIEQKe92VM3icef" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --WULnlhxwVlRL9uqJdIpIEQKe92VM3icef Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="c2vCtBc8sb8SF4UVhmSP2t5GevXPK7gPw"; protected-headers="v1" From: Colin Ian King To: Mark Brown Cc: Liam Girdwood , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] regulator: lp8755: fix spelling mistake "acceess" -> "access" References: <20170510083020.27600-1-colin.king@canonical.com> <20170514092551.kpqm5c3em5p52wri@sirena.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20170514092551.kpqm5c3em5p52wri@sirena.org.uk> --c2vCtBc8sb8SF4UVhmSP2t5GevXPK7gPw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 14/05/17 10:25, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 09:30:20AM +0100, Colin King wrote: >> From: Colin Ian King >> >> Trivial fix to spelling mistake in dev_err messages. >=20 > If this is a resend why do I not seem to have a copy of this patch? >=20 Probably because I goofed up. Doh. --c2vCtBc8sb8SF4UVhmSP2t5GevXPK7gPw-- --WULnlhxwVlRL9uqJdIpIEQKe92VM3icef Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQI2BAEBCAAgBQJZGWl9GRxjb2xpbi5raW5nQGNhbm9uaWNhbC5jb20ACgkQaMKH 38aoAiawQg//ROb6EsMw1M925usfA/G5mGxvr0SjQquQJPxf9Jbjm61ZUgMp8lOV i5gtDaV2CQQmKMDZj33XdQzg7We8lOePFAxzJkOY+zKVEeE2mVK0MHSwLbfXzt81 2jlQ/SrrMFTb35gk9qcvq7n42sxipuL1fWeheLGYUaSqEenJzNv2WbSLcDo9IeXO WMOdhy6U/obIZW2znnwF3IAVpQfZ2cGnhiLkNk4oZtverZ7JFsa0CeX3JYEOk1G8 Mq0ZPVLx8jWRZFCnQ5SUqV6n5d6sqbeGSogdpiDsN/QyFhErlWcrK0+sf/7c1KEH Uv9vYuB9ob8XHifFH7iVA+lyC2PZXeH7BZQGEr8KXMyB+5X11D0xfJBAMToDHZka JyJZ/OjdqOSL61hSV4FijlI9I9tbPnVKBKegrWNfODq5HXDsif9LZ6GaN3KU5y8/ 7mybpSP2vQTmiyo8oQWhwhQLCPndE+yUYJ1RR7SAt2qTPtR2dmw+82NIcjLL++9c 5wSBg6AuiO6PlFcaKimrC7Tsh7p7eCGuLPfK0+G2XgOiJyT32sJDWX+oQ+LUvrf0 xC3yFe3I9AOm4r/y2L6/l9XxQOeH8/Qaf2CPWsoS9UvHls2deJjkaZwC/viTguXY CrtQVVmVB5N1qt7WF+dxzxP0edYwVtKI2wgoss6OprLngSF5Hexjgvo= =IxM/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WULnlhxwVlRL9uqJdIpIEQKe92VM3icef--