mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>,
	luben.tuikov@amd.com, airlied@gmail.com, daniel@ffwll.ch,
	l.stach@pengutronix.de, christian.koenig@amd.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/scheduler: set entity to NULL in drm_sched_entity_pop_job()
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 10:39:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ddaf4984-6f5a-404c-df9d-537245e99420@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230418100453.4433-1-dakr@redhat.com>

On 18/04/2023 11:04, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> It already happend a few times that patches slipped through which
> implemented access to an entity through a job that was already removed
> from the entities queue. Since jobs and entities might have different
> lifecycles, this can potentially cause UAF bugs.
> 
> In order to make it obvious that a jobs entity pointer shouldn't be
> accessed after drm_sched_entity_pop_job() was called successfully, set
> the jobs entity pointer to NULL once the job is removed from the entity
> queue.
> 
> Moreover, debugging a potential NULL pointer dereference is way easier
> than potentially corrupted memory through a UAF.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>

This triggers a splat for me (with Panfrost driver), the cause of which
is the following code in drm_sched_get_cleanup_job():

	if (job) {
		job->entity->elapsed_ns += ktime_to_ns(
			ktime_sub(job->s_fence->finished.timestamp,
				  job->s_fence->scheduled.timestamp));
	}

which indeed is accessing entity after the job has been returned from
drm_sched_entity_pop_job(). And obviously job->entity is a NULL pointer
with this patch.

I'm afraid I don't fully understand the lifecycle so I'm not sure if
this is simply exposing an existing bug in drm_sched_get_cleanup_job()
or if this commit needs to be reverted.

Thanks,

Steve

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c | 6 ++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c   | 4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> index 15d04a0ec623..a9c6118e534b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> @@ -448,6 +448,12 @@ struct drm_sched_job *drm_sched_entity_pop_job(struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
>  			drm_sched_rq_update_fifo(entity, next->submit_ts);
>  	}
>  
> +	/* Jobs and entities might have different lifecycles. Since we're
> +	 * removing the job from the entities queue, set the jobs entity pointer
> +	 * to NULL to prevent any future access of the entity through this job.
> +	 */
> +	sched_job->entity = NULL;
> +
>  	return sched_job;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> index 9b16480686f6..e89a3e469cd5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,10 @@
>   *    the hardware.
>   *
>   * The jobs in a entity are always scheduled in the order that they were pushed.
> + *
> + * Note that once a job was taken from the entities queue and pushed to the
> + * hardware, i.e. the pending queue, the entity must not be referenced anymore
> + * through the jobs entity pointer.
>   */
>  
>  #include <linux/kthread.h>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-19  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-18 10:04 Danilo Krummrich
2023-04-19  2:16 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-04-19  9:39 ` Steven Price [this message]
2023-04-19  9:44   ` Lucas Stach
2023-04-19  9:53     ` Steven Price
2023-04-19 10:05       ` Steven Price
2023-04-19 10:07       ` Lucas Stach
2023-04-19 16:28         ` Luben Tuikov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ddaf4984-6f5a-404c-df9d-537245e99420@arm.com \
    --to=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dakr@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luben.tuikov@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®