From: Yang Li <yang.li@amlogic.com>
To: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: hci_core: lookup pa sync need check BIG sync state
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 10:21:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ddb21387-a164-4e38-a4f3-41c66bc02acf@amlogic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABBYNZ+mB+rb+6hG9s7fmvqwti8oSoQ27+_Cz56_ZD7C5t3cQA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Luiz,
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 5:19 AM Yang Li <yang.li@amlogic.com> wrote:
>> Hi luiz,
>>
>>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 9:18 PM Yang Li via B4 Relay
>>> <devnull+yang.li.amlogic.com@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>> From: Yang Li <yang.li@amlogic.com>
>>>>
>>>> Ignore the big sync connections, we are looking for the PA
>>>> sync connection that was created as a result of the PA sync
>>>> established event.
>>> Were you seeing an issue with this, if you do please describe it and
>>> add the traces, debug logs, etc.
>> connect list:
>>
>> [ 61.826679][2 T1974 d.] list conn: conn 00000000a6e8ac83 handle
>> 0x0f01 state 1, flags 0x40000220
>>
>> pa_sync_conn.flags = HCI_CONN_PA_SYNC
>>
>> [ 61.827155][2 T1974 d.] list conn: conn 0000000073b03cb6 handle
>> 0x0100 state 1, flags 0x48000220
>> [ 61.828254][2 T1974 d.] list conn: conn 00000000a7e091c9 handle
>> 0x0101 state 1, flags 0x48000220
>>
>> big_sync_conn.flags = HCI_CONN_PA_SYNC | HCI_CONN_BIG_SYNC
> This is a bug then, it should have both PA_SYNC and BIG_SYNC together,
> also I think we should probably disambiguate this by not using
> BIS_LINK for PA_SYNC, byt introducing PA_LINK as conn->type.
Yes, I agree with your point.
Adding PA_LINK can make it clearer to distinguish between PA sync and
BIG sync links.
Let me try to update it accordingly.
>
>> If the PA sync connection is deleted, then when hci_le_big_sync_lost_evt
>> is executed, hci_conn_hash_lookup_pa_sync_handle should return NULL,
>> However, it currently returns the BIS1 connection instead, because bis
>> conn also has HCI_CONN_PA_SYNC set.
>>
>> Therefore, I added an HCI_CONN_BIG_SYNC check in
>> hci_conn_hash_lookup_pa_sync_handle to filter out BIS connections.
>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.li@amlogic.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h | 7 +++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
>>>> index 3ce1fb6f5822..646b0c5fd7a5 100644
>>>> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
>>>> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
>>>> @@ -1400,6 +1400,13 @@ hci_conn_hash_lookup_pa_sync_handle(struct hci_dev *hdev, __u16 sync_handle)
>>>> if (c->type != BIS_LINK)
>>>> continue;
>>>>
>>>> + /* Ignore the big sync connections, we are looking
>>>> + * for the PA sync connection that was created as
>>>> + * a result of the PA sync established event.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (test_bit(HCI_CONN_BIG_SYNC, &c->flags))
>>>> + continue;
>>>> +
>>> hci_conn_hash_lookup_pa_sync_big_handle does:
>>>
>>> if (c->type != BIS_LINK ||
>>> !test_bit(HCI_CONN_PA_SYNC, &c->flags))
>>
>> Please forgive my misunderstanding.
>>
>>>> /* Ignore the listen hcon, we are looking
>>>> * for the child hcon that was created as
>>>> * a result of the PA sync established event.
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> base-commit: 3bc46213b81278f3a9df0324768e152de71eb9fe
>>>> change-id: 20250701-pa_sync-2fc7fc9f592c
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> --
>>>> Yang Li <yang.li@amlogic.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Luiz Augusto von Dentz
>
>
> --
> Luiz Augusto von Dentz
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-04 2:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-02 1:18 Yang Li via B4 Relay
2025-07-02 13:12 ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2025-07-03 8:30 ` Yang Li
2025-07-03 8:48 ` Yang Li
2025-07-03 9:19 ` Yang Li
2025-07-03 13:29 ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2025-07-04 2:21 ` Yang Li [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ddb21387-a164-4e38-a4f3-41c66bc02acf@amlogic.com \
--to=yang.li@amlogic.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®