From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FC5C352BE for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 01:30:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9820E20737 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 01:30:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="laMZ5Nan" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2392578AbgDOBaF (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2020 21:30:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59152 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2392569AbgDOBaC (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2020 21:30:02 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1042.google.com (mail-pj1-x1042.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1042]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95BC5C061A0E for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 18:30:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1042.google.com with SMTP id e16so5783923pjp.1 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 18:30:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tw1ol9hIySF4SEjxnV31z4ZCVunCJuhUBUf/qto1qDk=; b=laMZ5Nan8iiNRpSb5q9KzmAhNq0103cgg0P5iWhae9Qsi/x3SVW2rFTff9y7AW73lo 8F4fnFznO5VZOoCeCsX0mzLIUv89kNsfmOe9fYYqAub8BAo8aK4+XqBPPmYJOc9kBVPh 3qYGgpDN5IPje/dughVgunhVwLRxi5cPfgL4ff8qxCYQK2icVh3o0oKs6ZpmyKDmgXWY ++NWG2mxot8LQD6vDjumovPtdoI88EPTBUCqMvZvDJ/VEzK/I6HiPd20caCi1hWE5/PI Et69wH51qCxh34ySRwZ8ziSniRw9A/3r80jRSi8eHvjhRM0V0bdMKH9DWKVZLUwk9rrm dytw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tw1ol9hIySF4SEjxnV31z4ZCVunCJuhUBUf/qto1qDk=; b=FWf0hKg7acdUnvcgSySIBr3IY+kxeESFTKgCQqyQktRRSU+PHnivV3fJ21OkXlEwxP mN216MEnlzN5kRuWYb1X5I3+Aqppc0q2e4QbULHzLuQathLhW6RISEYAfkFp88J19xZM QIafGtYx6YtpLAoMUGhVwLIt8QwpJNlAbUiK9onav3OuZ+vQ/bPHy0EZfU/Zhnev3u5+ BR2LhDzXW7JeRfWWYYWSZxUHPzsWJLpKpsyV6QatIqPr19N5KByHfdNmB4f9zOUNggT3 z866yaWnFvi9KN2CF7OU1Y62unXwz9zjXgql3zb19aAbKoNifFnurNoEQSFJPTiQ2R34 t/xQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZYO99iILH2paDw27YwblcoGzC8QoG8VrFVlw4egG/YYEr1jquG wetZV1GmCIZ5Tw2fkak5sE4zDdwO6CTkZQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKse0Vw4MTAK2eIDz+rkZLvUptgDnRhmyWoFDYLfNVx8BAvRbQCsJSge6k3bnsrPrr5WcPaSA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8487:: with SMTP id c7mr2378462plo.251.1586914199821; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 18:29:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.188] ([66.219.217.145]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y9sm12551095pfo.135.2020.04.14.18.29.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Apr 2020 18:29:59 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] timeout and sequence fixes To: Pavel Begunkov , io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 19:29:57 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/14/20 3:39 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote: > [4/4] is dirty, but fixes the issue. And there is still "SQ vs CQ" > problem, solving which can effectively revert it, so I suggest to > postpone the last patch for a while. I'll rebase if it'd be necessary. > Thanks, I've applied 1-3 for now. Looks good to me, and also tests out fine. -- Jens Axboe