From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com (bali.collaboradmins.com [148.251.105.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D7D5DF60 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 02:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743473728; cv=none; b=bcuBHIUFCJ3p0MwOP+/6qZoxc1/2TiarA+7plcMkYK+NweHIcN940peTswwP0MtPwyaS34PiPbfUl3T5Dqy82NHJ0RG8Ob8jOmBv/pEoegDowks+bRfuqZ8yrtddKluf4V66n3iTFNZ9LwNlnwakwHCcouCee0fLmidsQ6lBRQA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743473728; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Fqvw6uxuRFvcoeqKohK6RGL/Kz3larBJDRQ1jIJPPXM=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=nkKVGmrtq7nJ144Ek1P8bf2ZU3rezsmMagiM0/R+mP29yza7aYZj/Jlu66RipEQMpAqnBD/HqU82kUsfF93yv1c4R3npDtgJ6WhHwDkpAHZhDffTz/5NyqUxODRtKLpWlErPsSK8Vr48vyu0nQMriADWP36sW4QPbyAR6P2plL4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=mSnWgYCS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="mSnWgYCS" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1743473724; bh=Fqvw6uxuRFvcoeqKohK6RGL/Kz3larBJDRQ1jIJPPXM=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=mSnWgYCSDUpsSYxqJzqP1YbE1hOkgqQANXSLFZZv2u0prxrNG+HUhtXFOoM76l7vN NgJYYva7aWM9t9rOIT9A9tiKpnUzEHAj4TEF3jgEjKGn+di042b+/RR9SJvCrZwOm1 xZguuoikmEzHe9ZFYinY9hXLq8IS9W6Orn9+RT4vQN82XIHAPCzP5gkMv92zkxB92H n/hcZ8nNpVDU0rrjhStbvihGmEaARONN/QUYhcCpRmIgk2Om2rHWyJ6hA1dHJzPKIT +JCo3wygXLpSpE3El6BhBbhsgOGcYeLp16KX+AglKj8kr5JTgA9XS5J7Y+uLzW5ZnT MDqzZ3hRWLc1A== Received: from [192.168.50.250] (unknown [171.76.83.191]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: vignesh) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CEE517E0CD1; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 04:15:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 07:45:09 +0530 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] drm/ci: Add jobs to validate devicetrees To: Dmitry Baryshkov , Maxime Ripard Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, daniels@collabora.com, helen.fornazier@gmail.com, airlied@gmail.com, simona.vetter@ffwll.ch, robdclark@gmail.com, guilherme.gallo@collabora.com, sergi.blanch.torne@collabora.com, valentine.burley@collabora.com, lumag@kernel.org, quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, tzimmermann@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20250327160117.945165-1-vignesh.raman@collabora.com> <20250327160117.945165-3-vignesh.raman@collabora.com> <20250331-amphibian-hopping-bobcat-e19a0b@houat> Content-Language: en-US From: Vignesh Raman In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Dmitry, On 31/03/25 13:25, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 at 10:53, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 08:06:45PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 09:31:11PM +0530, Vignesh Raman wrote: >>>> Add jobs to run dt_binding_check and dtbs_check. If warnings are seen, >>>> exit with a non-zero error code while configuring them as warning in >>>> the GitLab CI pipeline. >>> >>> Can it really succeed or is it going to be an always-failing job? The >>> dt_binding_check generally succeed, dtbs_check generates tons of >>> warnings. We are trying to make progress there, but it's still very far >>> from being achevable. >> >> It depends on the platforms I guess. Some are 100% covered and any >> warning should be treated as a failure, and some have not started the >> effort. >> >> I guess we could solve it with some kind of expectation list, but I do >> wonder if it's something *we* should be focusing on :) > > I think that we might want to limit this to `make dt_bindings_check > DT_SCHEMA_FILES=display`, checking all GPU / display schema files. > Yes, will test the changes and send v2. Regards, Vignesh