From: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@kernel.org>
To: paulmck@kernel.org, Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@kernel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Add two-byte cmpxchg emulation and wire it into the architectures
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 12:13:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ddde3609-f068-4f26-92c0-e9244f290eaf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a7883a3-a1b1-4d37-8234-f4c62b2e6e27@paulmck-laptop>
On 9/22/26 11:59, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 07:37:54PM +0100, Bradley Morgan wrote:
>> On 22 September 2026 19:29:32 BST, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 05:33:49PM +0000, Bradley Morgan wrote:
>>>> This is v4 of the two byte cmpxchg emulation series, wiring
>>>> cmpxchg_emu_u16() into arc, csky, sh and xtensa.
>>>>
>>>> v3 had changed cmpxchg_emu_u8()'s success return to (u16)old, which was
>>>> a 16-bit mask in the 8-bit function, and a dead one at that, since the
>>>> compare guarantees the low 8 bits of old are the byte being returned.
>>>> David Laight asked where that cast came from. v4 returns old unmasked,
>>>> the exact behaviour the one-byte emulator always had, so nothing that
>>>> uses cmpxchg_emu_u8() through the widened prototypes sees a change.
>>>>
>>>> David also noted v3 extended the (unsigned long)(0 ? *ptr : (old)) type
>>>> check to csky and sh but not arc and xtensa. v4 adds it there too, so a
>>>> cmpxchg(&p, 4, 5) fails to compile on every architecture in the series,
>>>> verified with each architecture's macro instantiated standalone.
>>>>
>>>> While adding the type check to arc, the switch subject turned out to be
>>>> sizeof((_p_)), the pointer, not sizeof(*(_p_)), the pointee. On 32-bit
>>>> arc the switch was always 4, so the size 1 and size 2 cases were dead
>>>> code and every sub-word cmpxchg() went through the 32-bit llock/scond
>>>> pair, comparing whole words against sub-word values, so the compare
>>>> almost never succeeded. The switch now tests the pointee, and the u8
>>>> path it was always meant to dispatch actually runs, so the one-byte
>>>> emulation works on arc for the first time since the sizeof bug landed
>>>> with the original cmpxchg_emu_u8() wiring.
>>>>
>>>> The host test of 972 cases across both halfword offsets against a byte
>>>> level reference model still passes, and a 20000 case randomized run
>>>> checking the masked compare and return against a hardware cmpxchg r16
>>>> model passes with zero mismatches.
>>>>
>>>> David pointed out on v1 that a u16 prototype does not compile warning
>>>> free when exchanging a pointer type, because the switch statements in
>>>> the architecture macros instantiate every size case, so a pointer
>>>> cmpxchg() type checks the two byte case, and the (u16) casts there
>>>> warn. v4 keeps taking the old and new values as unsigned long and
>>>> casting to u16 inside the function, so the call sites need no narrowing
>>>> casts and pointer exchanges compile clean. The function still compares
>>>> and returns exactly the 16 bits the caller asked for, which matches
>>>> hardware cmpxchg r16 behaviour.
>>>>
>>>> The ARMv6 wiring stays dropped from v1, per Arnd Bergmann's offer to
>>>> take the INTEGRATOR_CM1136JFS cleanup in his platform removal series.
>>> I have pulled these in, but only to expose them to things like the kernel
>>> test robot. My guess is that they will go in by some other path.
>>>
>>> And to that end:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
>>>
>>> But I could of course easily be missing subtle arch-specific bugs.
>> There are, according to sashiko, but I can't seem to make that thing happy
>> no matter what I do
> Hahahahaha!!!
>
> We forgot to CC the architecture maintainers.
No you didn't - they were CC'ed all along.
I'll give this is a test run and report back later.
Both the cover letter and 1/5 explain what is being done and not clearly
why ?
Is there an existing or proposed user for this API.
Otherwise it will just bit-rot. No big deal from arch code pov but just
saying...
Thx,
-Vineet
>
> For the changes to lib/cmpxchg-emu.c:
>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
>
> For ARC:
>
> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@kernel.org>
> linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
>
> For sh:
>
> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
> Cc: <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>
>
> For csky:
>
> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
> Cc: <linux-csky@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
>
> For xtensa:
>
> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
>
> They might be willing to help. ;-)
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
>>>> Bradley Morgan (5):
>>>> lib: Add two-byte cmpxchg emulation function
>>>> ARC: Emulate two-byte cmpxchg
>>>> sh: Emulate two-byte cmpxchg
>>>> csky: Emulate two-byte cmpxchg
>>>> xtensa: Emulate two-byte cmpxchg
>> --- Thanks!
>> "I'm not a very positive person" - Linus torvalds
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 17:33 Bradley Morgan
2026-09-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] lib: Add two-byte cmpxchg emulation function Bradley Morgan
2026-09-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 2/5] ARC: Emulate two-byte cmpxchg Bradley Morgan
2026-09-23 9:30 ` David Laight
2026-09-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] sh: " Bradley Morgan
2026-09-23 9:28 ` David Laight
2026-09-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 4/5] csky: " Bradley Morgan
2026-09-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 5/5] xtensa: " Bradley Morgan
2026-09-22 18:29 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Add two-byte cmpxchg emulation and wire it into the architectures Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-22 18:37 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-22 18:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-22 19:03 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-22 19:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-22 19:13 ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2026-09-22 19:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-23 9:32 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ddde3609-f068-4f26-92c0-e9244f290eaf@kernel.org \
--to=vgupta@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=brads@mainlining.org \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-csky@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®