From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE98FC3A5A6 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 06:55:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D5120820 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 06:55:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazon.com header.i=@amazon.com header.b="YOa1vj/d" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727673AbfIVGzy (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Sep 2019 02:55:54 -0400 Received: from smtp-fw-6001.amazon.com ([52.95.48.154]:63907 "EHLO smtp-fw-6001.amazon.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727640AbfIVGzx (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Sep 2019 02:55:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amazon.com; i=@amazon.com; q=dns/txt; s=amazon201209; t=1569135352; x=1600671352; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gWgdLrARls0GrnyzF+OrQtm8H+2wz1GFIztrAN9r0t0=; b=YOa1vj/dmMitq29uqqFrdO/BUbVwqk5ugtNDaYbb1c17kRsGHP8+Jn82 26usevx4I7B6isNeQ9UvB/PTWC2gHgXNZp7qd7AHlfG3VJ/Z5xAaHgZGV n7Gnu5d9heRNHszrhtKuh2LQh1Gv+C2STBSP7dI5bsPfZDIUFVgYlg8gT s=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,535,1559520000"; d="scan'208";a="416736677" Received: from iad6-co-svc-p1-lb1-vlan3.amazon.com (HELO email-inbound-relay-1d-9ec21598.us-east-1.amazon.com) ([10.124.125.6]) by smtp-border-fw-out-6001.iad6.amazon.com with ESMTP; 22 Sep 2019 06:55:49 +0000 Received: from EX13MTAUEA001.ant.amazon.com (iad55-ws-svc-p15-lb9-vlan3.iad.amazon.com [10.40.159.166]) by email-inbound-relay-1d-9ec21598.us-east-1.amazon.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68832A22E2; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 06:55:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EX13D01EUB001.ant.amazon.com (10.43.166.194) by EX13MTAUEA001.ant.amazon.com (10.43.61.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1367.3; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 06:55:48 +0000 Received: from [10.125.238.52] (10.43.161.176) by EX13D01EUB001.ant.amazon.com (10.43.166.194) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1367.3; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 06:55:42 +0000 Subject: Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] soc: amazon: al-pos: Introduce Amazon's Annapurna Labs POS driver To: James Morse CC: Marc Zyngier , , , , , , , , , , , , References: <1568142310-17622-1-git-send-email-talel@amazon.com> <1568142310-17622-3-git-send-email-talel@amazon.com> <86d0g6syva.wl-maz@kernel.org> <3205f7ae-5568-c064-23ac-ea726246173b@amazon.com> <865zlxsxtd.wl-maz@kernel.org> <36f19b3f-46d3-f6d0-3681-71e3a9bb52ce@amazon.com> <93e5ac72-13e1-4672-16f0-62ee6b8a8390@arm.com> From: "Shenhar, Talel" Message-ID: Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 09:55:36 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <93e5ac72-13e1-4672-16f0-62ee6b8a8390@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.43.161.176] X-ClientProxiedBy: EX13D17UWC001.ant.amazon.com (10.43.162.188) To EX13D01EUB001.ant.amazon.com (10.43.166.194) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/19/2019 5:42 PM, James Morse wrote: > Hi guys, > > On 12/09/2019 10:19, Shenhar, Talel wrote: >> On 9/12/2019 11:50 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 07:50:03 +0100, >>> "Shenhar, Talel" wrote: >>>> On 9/11/2019 5:15 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 20:05:09 +0100, >>>>> Talel Shenhar wrote: >>>>> >> James, will love your input from EDAC point of view, does it make sense to plug >> un-correctable only event to EDAC? > I think this device is an example of something like a "Fabric switch units" in > Documentation/driver-api/edac.rst. It makes sense that it should be described as a > 'device' to edac. You can then use the existing user-space tools to control/report/monitor > the values. Thank you James, Will port this logic to be edac device. > > > Thanks, > > James