From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751602AbdITRyW (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2017 13:54:22 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:59829 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751024AbdITRyT (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2017 13:54:19 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning To: Joe Perches , Sergey Senozhatsky , Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , James Bottomley Cc: Petr Mladek , Steven Rostedt , Andrew Morton , Jessica Yu , Alexei Starovoitov , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft References: <20170920162910.32053-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <20170920162910.32053-8-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <1505929138.12311.5.camel@perches.com> From: Helge Deller Message-ID: Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 19:53:49 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1505929138.12311.5.camel@perches.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:tAEHGZ1hA0YbjijvBDQdFAheOkAn8F+wHqMCNj0LHheVvy5fhjP Z6CpbMcHYegTu7+4VF57ICyv+0E0WYa2k1SOTMnUM1AQu16IDw+r/i2B92BYSE3zVIqgvEO 8vcF7aAX0AWGGn1jfqLHEaddOLkB6CQ1y/7ex790A1r/t2r6TQaYg1nKf4o1TXmr93sA0tT /nSio23m6OaYptwJeuL+g== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:ZKcV+RtwsnQ=:rvJC+BZYUch0dZOUBcsL5M OTmnwaQ4mbIxmos92Ky54bllMUC8HBiDghZ/uz/ir3ITBe/reMG+spiRUZSauzdWJzU9OP3fO /LAHPvK3+xlZHl/OcytNMawOoF8RsxC7NQIMN2TbFXi1rnYuqrL4ySrTWFyeoczIXbnqTjfrx vmEXw8eUjqv7OflqjnN+F7XyTlYu0gx8HZdrsEWOAsxTS2jslPPg119nh+7wl170PcAudB6M4 gnvWs0CfuwY+9M30JjS9MZux0O3AL4XfzNRcMh/aWd0IV7jG6dqX5Du1JL2GACOEJHb7YeGDL YNyDD+AbCZlrgwQz6XRwk8vy4lj51PvDcoUxmWGMsGxtMIG+C9LNWL8bsD2Aa1o96mes43ZlI 0PgBWvrHw5eq+m9FWxvecohuncjdAQaMrDYxw4HCIhB7hWUoqUFAEuH4ARR5RLv5G3hZtFxFt ZqXgb8leVP9kmV3Nq9kwL6ZlskdxGF35vxmP58D6qcPy11uFGfujc7HNNaUfqnuZv518mv6Lr Th40+fTilcfvVrpvSzAouXueaQ+h6DHCsAxuvXy7kdJZjw+EJcFhyb7W4Zp034bQ3v8wgOmIM VK1wA1lgahg2jfU6vh3Low19gvjDkW21R+NrxoLUTXo4A9JnyfPGiVeEBIIMG7/g5DpWTo+kg GN2reQuWc6rBHcWaBmuqGnmUf7JZzvI1UdJf8pO2YZ1QSRHA7yrwVKSAXCyS8SiL9vwoNyGG2 9B8e0ETM16O/ajgYl82Rl1ksS+rMrlI8QIt8CYeVuAl/1NTS2LRYnXTAr2+Ht7GtWfY0moywU /zJhv6SqYsO1/75Vz2EZVlK/KDrQbE3VRCA//bMM6wy6TXlFU8= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 20.09.2017 19:38, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 01:29 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: >> We deprecated '%pF/%pf' printk specifiers, since '%pS/%ps' is now smart >> enough to handle function pointer dereference on platforms where such >> dereference is required. >> >> checkpatch warning example: >> >> WARNING: Use '%pS/%ps' instead. This pointer extension was deprecated: '%pF' > > If this series is accepted, I think this message > is unclear and would prefer something like: Is it worth to mention, that it's still needed in older kernels? Just in case some patch get's backported. Helge