mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinan Liu <yinan@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] scripts: ftrace - move the nop-processing in ftrace_init to compile time
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 23:28:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <de1bbbc9-3d66-a3dd-550f-509032be20ba@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210911101247.4a37ec51@rorschach.local.home>

This is my GCC version: GCC version 4.8.5 20150623 (red hat 4.8.5-44) 
(GCC) .

In fact, I see the make_nop processing in recordmcount. I'm still 
confused why this part can be directly replaced?


在 2021/9/11 下午10:12, Steven Rostedt 写道:
> On Sat, 11 Sep 2021 21:50:43 +0800
> Yinan Liu <yinan@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>> When ftrace is enabled, ftrace_init will consume a period of
>> time, usually around 15~20ms. Approximately 60% of the time is
>> consumed by nop-processing. Moving the nop-processing to the
>> compile time can speed up the kernel boot process.
>>
>> performance test:
>>          env:    Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2682 v4 @ 2.50GHz
>>          method: before and after patching, compare the
>>                  total time of ftrace_init(), and verify
>>                  the functionality of ftrace.
>>
>>          avg_time of ftrace_init:
>>                  with patch: 7.114ms
>>                  without patch: 15.763ms
> What compiler are you using? Because by default, gcc should already do
> this for you. In fact, recordmcount isn't even called with the latest
> gcc, as gcc creates mcount_loc and inserts nops.
>
> This was implemented before, but because we use to have "ideal nops"
> that was determined at run time, because the different CPUs had
> different efficiency on what nop was used, we had to do it at run time.
> But that is no longer the case today, so we can revisit this.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Yinan Liu <yinan@linux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>>   kernel/trace/ftrace.c  |  4 ++++
>>   scripts/recordmcount.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>> index c236da868990..ae3fba331179 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>> @@ -6261,6 +6261,10 @@ static int ftrace_process_locs(struct module *mod,
>>   	 * until we are finished with it, and there's no
>>   	 * reason to cause large interrupt latencies while we do it.
>>   	 */
>> +#if defined CONFIG_X86 || defined CONFIG_X86_64 || defined CONFIG_ARM || defined CONFIG_ARM64
> We don't list archs in generic files. The above needs to be something like:
>
> #ifdef ARCH_HAS_MCOUNT_NOP
>
> or some name like that, and then that macro gets defined by the arch
> header (include/asm/ftrace.h)
>
>
>
>> +	ret = 0;
>> +	goto out;
>> +#endif
> space should be here.
>
>>   	if (!mod)
>>   		local_irq_save(flags);
>>   	ftrace_update_code(mod, start_pg);
> -- Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-11 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-11 13:50 [PATCH 0/2] ftrace: improve ftrace during compiling Yinan Liu
2021-09-11 13:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] scripts: ftrace - move the sort-processing in ftrace_init to compile time Yinan Liu
2021-09-11 13:59   ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-03 13:42     ` Yinan Liu
2021-10-08 23:48       ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-09  2:56         ` Yinan Liu
2021-10-25 13:20           ` Yinan Liu
2021-10-25 15:00             ` Steven Rostedt
2021-09-11 13:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] scripts: ftrace - move the nop-processing " Yinan Liu
2021-09-11 14:12   ` Steven Rostedt
2021-09-11 15:28     ` Yinan Liu [this message]
2021-09-11 16:07       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-11 14:33   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-11 17:15   ` kernel test robot
2021-09-11 18:04   ` kernel test robot
2021-11-16  2:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] ftrace optimization at " Yinan Liu
2021-11-16  2:49   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] scripts: ftrace - move the sort-processing in ftrace_init to " Yinan Liu
2021-11-16  8:07     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-16 12:42       ` Yinan Liu
2021-11-16 13:05         ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-16 14:46           ` Yinan Liu
2021-11-17 13:34     ` kernel test robot
2021-11-16  2:49   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] scripts: ftrace - move the nop-processing " Yinan Liu
2021-11-16  8:10     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-16 12:51       ` Yinan Liu
2021-11-16 13:07       ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-16 15:02         ` Yinan Liu
2021-11-16 16:06     ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-22 13:43 ` [PATCH v3] scripts: ftrace - move the sort-processing " Yinan Liu
2021-11-23 10:54 ` [PATCH v4] ftrace sorting optimization changelog Yinan Liu
2021-11-23 10:54   ` [PATCH v4] scripts: ftrace - move the sort-processing in ftrace_init to compile time Yinan Liu
2021-11-29  2:13     ` Yinan Liu
2021-11-29  3:51       ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-29  6:52         ` Yinan Liu
2021-11-30 17:08     ` Steven Rostedt
2021-12-01  5:32 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] ftrace sorting optimization changelog Yinan Liu
2021-12-01  5:32   ` [PATCH v5 1/2] scripts: ftrace - move the sort-processing in ftrace_init to compile time Yinan Liu
2021-12-01 21:45     ` Steven Rostedt
2021-12-05 12:35     ` [scripts] 12955fb1c5: kernel-selftests.livepatch.test-ftrace.sh.fail kernel test robot
2021-12-01  5:32   ` [PATCH v5 2/2] script/sorttable: code style improvements Yinan Liu
2021-12-02  2:16 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] ftrace sorting optimization changelog Yinan Liu
2021-12-02  2:16   ` [PATCH v6 1/2] scripts: ftrace - move the sort-processing in ftrace_init Yinan Liu
2021-12-02 17:58     ` Steven Rostedt
2021-12-05 12:45       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-12-06 20:18       ` Steven Rostedt
2021-12-07  1:29         ` Yinan Liu
2021-12-02  2:16   ` [PATCH v6 2/2] script/sorttable: code style improvements Yinan Liu
2021-12-02 15:30   ` [PATCH v6 0/2] ftrace sorting optimization changelog Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-07 15:13 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] ftrace sorting optimization Yinan Liu
2021-12-07 15:13   ` [PATCH v7 1/2] scripts: ftrace - move the sort-processing in ftrace_init Yinan Liu
2021-12-11 14:50     ` Steven Rostedt
2021-12-07 15:13   ` [PATCH v7 2/2] script/sorttable: code style improvements Yinan Liu
2021-12-12 11:33 ` [PATCH v8 0/1] change log Yinan Liu
2021-12-12 11:33   ` [PATCH v8] scripts: ftrace - move the sort-processing in ftrace_init Yinan Liu
2022-01-21  9:46     ` Sven Schnelle
2022-01-21 10:42       ` Heiko Carstens
2022-01-21 11:14         ` Sven Schnelle
2022-01-21 11:29           ` Sven Schnelle
2022-01-21 18:11         ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-22  9:17           ` Heiko Carstens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=de1bbbc9-3d66-a3dd-550f-509032be20ba@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=yinan@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome