mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, hch@lst.de,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/11] virtio-vdpa: Support interrupt affinity spreading mechanism
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 14:12:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <de2efe1a-1868-2552-7a1a-4aed398dfb98@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230324051153-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>


在 2023/3/24 17:12, Michael S. Tsirkin 写道:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 02:27:52PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 1:31 PM Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com> wrote:
>>> To support interrupt affinity spreading mechanism,
>>> this makes use of group_cpus_evenly() to create
>>> an irq callback affinity mask for each virtqueue
>>> of vdpa device. Then we will unify set_vq_affinity
>>> callback to pass the affinity to the vdpa device driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
>> Thinking hard of all the logics, I think I've found something interesting.
>>
>> Commit ad71473d9c437 ("virtio_blk: use virtio IRQ affinity") tries to
>> pass irq_affinity to transport specific find_vqs().  This seems a
>> layer violation since driver has no knowledge of
>>
>> 1) whether or not the callback is based on an IRQ
>> 2) whether or not the device is a PCI or not (the details are hided by
>> the transport driver)
>> 3) how many vectors could be used by a device
>>
>> This means the driver can't actually pass a real affinity masks so the
>> commit passes a zero irq affinity structure as a hint in fact, so the
>> PCI layer can build a default affinity based that groups cpus evenly
>> based on the number of MSI-X vectors (the core logic is the
>> group_cpus_evenly). I think we should fix this by replacing the
>> irq_affinity structure with
>>
>> 1) a boolean like auto_cb_spreading
>>
>> or
>>
>> 2) queue to cpu mapping
>>
>> So each transport can do its own logic based on that. Then virtio-vDPA
>> can pass that policy to VDUSE where we only need a group_cpus_evenly()
>> and avoid duplicating irq_create_affinity_masks()?
>>
>> Thanks
> I don't really understand what you propose. Care to post a patch?


I meant to avoid passing irq_affinity structure in find_vqs but an array 
of boolean telling us whether or not the vq requires a automatic 
spreading of callbacks. But it seems less flexible.


> Also does it have to block this patchset or can it be done on top?


We can leave it in the future.

So

Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>

Thanks


>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c
>>> index f72696b4c1c2..f3826f42b704 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c
>>> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>>>   #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>>   #include <linux/slab.h>
>>>   #include <linux/uuid.h>
>>> +#include <linux/group_cpus.h>
>>>   #include <linux/virtio.h>
>>>   #include <linux/vdpa.h>
>>>   #include <linux/virtio_config.h>
>>> @@ -272,6 +273,66 @@ static void virtio_vdpa_del_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>>>                  virtio_vdpa_del_vq(vq);
>>>   }
>>>
>>> +static void default_calc_sets(struct irq_affinity *affd, unsigned int affvecs)
>>> +{
>>> +       affd->nr_sets = 1;
>>> +       affd->set_size[0] = affvecs;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static struct cpumask *
>>> +create_affinity_masks(unsigned int nvecs, struct irq_affinity *affd)
>>> +{
>>> +       unsigned int affvecs = 0, curvec, usedvecs, i;
>>> +       struct cpumask *masks = NULL;
>>> +
>>> +       if (nvecs > affd->pre_vectors + affd->post_vectors)
>>> +               affvecs = nvecs - affd->pre_vectors - affd->post_vectors;
>>> +
>>> +       if (!affd->calc_sets)
>>> +               affd->calc_sets = default_calc_sets;
>>> +
>>> +       affd->calc_sets(affd, affvecs);
>>> +
>>> +       if (!affvecs)
>>> +               return NULL;
>>> +
>>> +       masks = kcalloc(nvecs, sizeof(*masks), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +       if (!masks)
>>> +               return NULL;
>>> +
>>> +       /* Fill out vectors at the beginning that don't need affinity */
>>> +       for (curvec = 0; curvec < affd->pre_vectors; curvec++)
>>> +               cpumask_setall(&masks[curvec]);
>>> +
>>> +       for (i = 0, usedvecs = 0; i < affd->nr_sets; i++) {
>>> +               unsigned int this_vecs = affd->set_size[i];
>>> +               int j;
>>> +               struct cpumask *result = group_cpus_evenly(this_vecs);
>>> +
>>> +               if (!result) {
>>> +                       kfree(masks);
>>> +                       return NULL;
>>> +               }
>>> +
>>> +               for (j = 0; j < this_vecs; j++)
>>> +                       cpumask_copy(&masks[curvec + j], &result[j]);
>>> +               kfree(result);
>>> +
>>> +               curvec += this_vecs;
>>> +               usedvecs += this_vecs;
>>> +       }
>>> +
>>> +       /* Fill out vectors at the end that don't need affinity */
>>> +       if (usedvecs >= affvecs)
>>> +               curvec = affd->pre_vectors + affvecs;
>>> +       else
>>> +               curvec = affd->pre_vectors + usedvecs;
>>> +       for (; curvec < nvecs; curvec++)
>>> +               cpumask_setall(&masks[curvec]);
>>> +
>>> +       return masks;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>   static int virtio_vdpa_find_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned int nvqs,
>>>                                  struct virtqueue *vqs[],
>>>                                  vq_callback_t *callbacks[],
>>> @@ -282,9 +343,15 @@ static int virtio_vdpa_find_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned int nvqs,
>>>          struct virtio_vdpa_device *vd_dev = to_virtio_vdpa_device(vdev);
>>>          struct vdpa_device *vdpa = vd_get_vdpa(vdev);
>>>          const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config;
>>> +       struct irq_affinity default_affd = { 0 };
>>> +       struct cpumask *masks;
>>>          struct vdpa_callback cb;
>>>          int i, err, queue_idx = 0;
>>>
>>> +       masks = create_affinity_masks(nvqs, desc ? desc : &default_affd);
>>> +       if (!masks)
>>> +               return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>>          for (i = 0; i < nvqs; ++i) {
>>>                  if (!names[i]) {
>>>                          vqs[i] = NULL;
>>> @@ -298,6 +365,7 @@ static int virtio_vdpa_find_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned int nvqs,
>>>                          err = PTR_ERR(vqs[i]);
>>>                          goto err_setup_vq;
>>>                  }
>>> +               ops->set_vq_affinity(vdpa, i, &masks[i]);
>>>          }
>>>
>>>          cb.callback = virtio_vdpa_config_cb;
>>> --
>>> 2.20.1
>>>


  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-28  6:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-23  5:30 [PATCH v4 00/11] VDUSE: Improve performance Xie Yongji
2023-03-23  5:30 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] lib/group_cpus: Export group_cpus_evenly() Xie Yongji
2023-04-04 18:20   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-03-23  5:30 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] vdpa: Add set/get_vq_affinity callbacks in vdpa_config_ops Xie Yongji
2023-03-23  5:30 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] virtio-vdpa: Support interrupt affinity spreading mechanism Xie Yongji
2023-03-24  6:27   ` Jason Wang
2023-03-24  9:12     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-03-28  6:12       ` Jason Wang [this message]
2023-03-28  3:03     ` Yongji Xie
2023-03-28  3:14       ` Jason Wang
2023-03-28  3:33         ` Yongji Xie
2023-03-28  3:44           ` Jason Wang
2023-03-28  4:04             ` Yongji Xie
2023-03-28  6:07               ` Jason Wang
2023-03-23  5:30 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] vduse: Refactor allocation for vduse virtqueues Xie Yongji
2023-03-23  5:30 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] vduse: Support set_vq_affinity callback Xie Yongji
2023-03-28  6:14   ` Jason Wang
2023-03-23  5:30 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] vduse: Support get_vq_affinity callback Xie Yongji
2023-03-28  6:15   ` Jason Wang
2023-03-23  5:30 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] vduse: Add sysfs interface for irq callback affinity Xie Yongji
2023-03-28  6:16   ` Jason Wang
2023-03-23  5:30 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] vdpa: Add eventfd for the vdpa callback Xie Yongji
2023-03-28  6:17   ` Jason Wang
2023-03-23  5:30 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] vduse: Signal vq trigger eventfd directly if possible Xie Yongji
2023-03-23  5:30 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] vduse: Delay iova domain creation Xie Yongji
2023-03-23  5:30 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] vduse: Support specifying bounce buffer size via sysfs Xie Yongji

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=de2efe1a-1868-2552-7a1a-4aed398dfb98@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xieyongji@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®