From: "Kalra, Ashish" <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@amd.com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] x86/sev: Treat the contiguous RMP table as a single RMP segment
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 06:51:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <de69eefa-0da3-4142-bcd0-257248c403f1@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e4ad82d80e8a484f1d0a46ec94b7c9fccf91d13e.1729708922.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
On 10/23/2024 1:42 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> In preparation for support of a segmented RMP table, treat the contiguous
> RMP table as a segmented RMP table with a single segment covering all
> of memory. By treating a contiguous RMP table as a single segment, much
> of the code that initializes and accesses the RMP can be re-used.
>
> Segmented RMP tables can have up to 512 segment entries. Each segment
> will have metadata associated with it to identify the segment location,
> the segment size, etc. The segment data and the physical address are used
> to determine the index of the segment within the table and then the RMP
> entry within the segment. For an actual segmented RMP table environment,
> much of the segment information will come from a configuration MSR. For
> the contiguous RMP, though, much of the information will be statically
> defined.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c | 193 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 174 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> index dd256e76e443..043b2582e10e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> #include <linux/iommu.h>
> #include <linux/amd-iommu.h>
> +#include <linux/nospec.h>
>
> #include <asm/sev.h>
> #include <asm/processor.h>
> @@ -74,12 +75,42 @@ struct rmpentry {
> */
> #define RMPTABLE_CPU_BOOKKEEPING_SZ 0x4000
>
> +/*
> + * For a non-segmented RMP table, use the maximum physical addressing as the
> + * segment size in order to always arrive at index 0 in the table.
> + */
> +#define RMPTABLE_NON_SEGMENTED_SHIFT 52
> +
> +struct rmp_segment_desc {
> + struct rmpentry *rmp_entry;
> + u64 max_index;
> + u64 size;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Segmented RMP Table support.
> + * - The segment size is used for two purposes:
> + * - Identify the amount of memory covered by an RMP segment
> + * - Quickly locate an RMP segment table entry for a physical address
> + *
> + * - The RMP segment table contains pointers to an RMP table that covers
> + * a specific portion of memory. There can be up to 512 8-byte entries,
> + * one pages worth.
> + */
> +static struct rmp_segment_desc **rmp_segment_table __ro_after_init;
> +static unsigned int rst_max_index __ro_after_init = 512;
> +
> +static u64 rmp_segment_size_max;
> +static unsigned int rmp_segment_coverage_shift;
> +static u64 rmp_segment_coverage_size;
> +static u64 rmp_segment_coverage_mask;
> +#define RST_ENTRY_INDEX(x) ((x) >> rmp_segment_coverage_shift)
> +#define RMP_ENTRY_INDEX(x) ((u64)(PHYS_PFN((x) & rmp_segment_coverage_mask)))
> +
> /* Mask to apply to a PFN to get the first PFN of a 2MB page */
> #define PFN_PMD_MASK GENMASK_ULL(63, PMD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
>
> static u64 probed_rmp_base, probed_rmp_size;
> -static struct rmpentry *rmptable __ro_after_init;
> -static u64 rmptable_max_pfn __ro_after_init;
>
> static LIST_HEAD(snp_leaked_pages_list);
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(snp_leaked_pages_list_lock);
> @@ -185,6 +216,92 @@ static bool __init init_rmptable_bookkeeping(void)
> return true;
> }
>
> +static bool __init alloc_rmp_segment_desc(u64 segment_pa, u64 segment_size, u64 pa)
> +{
> + struct rmp_segment_desc *desc;
> + void *rmp_segment;
> + u64 rst_index;
> +
> + /* Validate the RMP segment size */
> + if (segment_size > rmp_segment_size_max) {
> + pr_err("Invalid RMP size (%#llx) for configured segment size (%#llx)\n",
> + segment_size, rmp_segment_size_max);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + /* Validate the RMP segment table index */
> + rst_index = RST_ENTRY_INDEX(pa);
> + if (rst_index >= rst_max_index) {
> + pr_err("Invalid RMP segment base address (%#llx) for configured segment size (%#llx)\n",
> + pa, rmp_segment_coverage_size);
> + return false;
> + }
> + rst_index = array_index_nospec(rst_index, rst_max_index);
> +
> + if (rmp_segment_table[rst_index]) {
> + pr_err("RMP segment descriptor already exists at index %llu\n", rst_index);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + /* Map the RMP entries */
> + rmp_segment = memremap(segment_pa, segment_size, MEMREMAP_WB);
> + if (!rmp_segment) {
> + pr_err("Failed to map RMP segment addr 0x%llx size 0x%llx\n",
> + segment_pa, segment_size);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + desc = kzalloc(sizeof(*desc), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!desc) {
> + memunmap(rmp_segment);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + desc->rmp_entry = rmp_segment;
> + desc->max_index = segment_size / sizeof(*desc->rmp_entry);
> + desc->size = segment_size;
> +
> + /* Add the segment descriptor to the table */
> + rmp_segment_table[rst_index] = desc;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static void __init free_rmp_segment_table(void)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < rst_max_index; i++) {
> + struct rmp_segment_desc *desc;
> +
> + desc = rmp_segment_table[i];
> + if (!desc)
> + continue;
> +
> + memunmap(desc->rmp_entry);
> +
> + kfree(desc);
> + }
> +
> + free_page((unsigned long)rmp_segment_table);
> +
> + rmp_segment_table = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static bool __init alloc_rmp_segment_table(void)
> +{
> + struct page *page;
> +
> + /* Allocate the table used to index into the RMP segments */
> + page = alloc_page(__GFP_ZERO);
> + if (!page)
> + return false;
> +
> + rmp_segment_table = page_address(page);
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Do the necessary preparations which are verified by the firmware as
> * described in the SNP_INIT_EX firmware command description in the SNP
> @@ -192,8 +309,8 @@ static bool __init init_rmptable_bookkeeping(void)
> */
> static int __init snp_rmptable_init(void)
> {
> - u64 max_rmp_pfn, calc_rmp_sz, rmptable_size, rmp_end, val;
> - void *rmptable_start;
> + u64 max_rmp_pfn, calc_rmp_sz, rmptable_segment, rmptable_size, rmp_end, val;
> + unsigned int i;
>
> if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP))
> return 0;
> @@ -222,17 +339,18 @@ static int __init snp_rmptable_init(void)
> goto nosnp;
> }
>
> + if (!alloc_rmp_segment_table())
> + goto nosnp;
> +
> /* Map only the RMP entries */
> - rmptable_start = memremap(probed_rmp_base + RMPTABLE_CPU_BOOKKEEPING_SZ,
> - probed_rmp_size - RMPTABLE_CPU_BOOKKEEPING_SZ,
> - MEMREMAP_WB);
> - if (!rmptable_start) {
> - pr_err("Failed to map RMP table\n");
> + rmptable_segment = probed_rmp_base + RMPTABLE_CPU_BOOKKEEPING_SZ;
> + rmptable_size = probed_rmp_size - RMPTABLE_CPU_BOOKKEEPING_SZ;
> +
> + if (!alloc_rmp_segment_desc(rmptable_segment, rmptable_size, 0)) {
> + free_rmp_segment_table();
> goto nosnp;
> }
>
> - rmptable_size = probed_rmp_size - RMPTABLE_CPU_BOOKKEEPING_SZ;
> -
> /*
> * Check if SEV-SNP is already enabled, this can happen in case of
> * kexec boot.
> @@ -243,12 +361,20 @@ static int __init snp_rmptable_init(void)
>
> /* Zero out the RMP bookkeeping area */
> if (!init_rmptable_bookkeeping()) {
> - memunmap(rmptable_start);
> + free_rmp_segment_table();
> goto nosnp;
> }
>
> /* Zero out the RMP entries */
> - memset(rmptable_start, 0, rmptable_size);
> + for (i = 0; i < rst_max_index; i++) {
> + struct rmp_segment_desc *desc;
> +
> + desc = rmp_segment_table[i];
> + if (!desc)
> + continue;
> +
> + memset(desc->rmp_entry, 0, desc->size);
> + }
>
> /* Flush the caches to ensure that data is written before SNP is enabled. */
> wbinvd_on_all_cpus();
> @@ -259,9 +385,6 @@ static int __init snp_rmptable_init(void)
> on_each_cpu(snp_enable, NULL, 1);
>
> skip_enable:
> - rmptable = (struct rmpentry *)rmptable_start;
> - rmptable_max_pfn = rmptable_size / sizeof(struct rmpentry) - 1;
> -
> cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "x86/rmptable_init:online", __snp_enable, NULL);
>
> /*
> @@ -282,6 +405,17 @@ static int __init snp_rmptable_init(void)
> */
> device_initcall(snp_rmptable_init);
>
> +static void set_rmp_segment_info(unsigned int segment_shift)
> +{
> + rmp_segment_coverage_shift = segment_shift;
> + rmp_segment_coverage_size = 1ULL << rmp_segment_coverage_shift;
> + rmp_segment_coverage_mask = rmp_segment_coverage_size - 1;
> +
> + /* Calculate the maximum size an RMP can be (16 bytes/page mapped) */
> + rmp_segment_size_max = PHYS_PFN(rmp_segment_coverage_size);
> + rmp_segment_size_max <<= 4;
> +}
> +
> #define RMP_ADDR_MASK GENMASK_ULL(51, 13)
>
> bool snp_probe_rmptable_info(void)
> @@ -303,6 +437,11 @@ bool snp_probe_rmptable_info(void)
>
> rmp_sz = rmp_end - rmp_base + 1;
>
> + /* Treat the contiguous RMP table as a single segment */
> + rst_max_index = 1;
> +
> + set_rmp_segment_info(RMPTABLE_NON_SEGMENTED_SHIFT);
> +
> probed_rmp_base = rmp_base;
> probed_rmp_size = rmp_sz;
>
> @@ -314,13 +453,29 @@ bool snp_probe_rmptable_info(void)
>
> static struct rmpentry *__get_rmpentry(u64 pfn)
> {
> - if (!rmptable)
> + struct rmp_segment_desc *desc;
> + u64 paddr, rst_index, segment_index;
> +
> + if (!rmp_segment_table)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>
> - if (unlikely(pfn > rmptable_max_pfn))
> + paddr = pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> + rst_index = RST_ENTRY_INDEX(paddr);
> + if (unlikely(rst_index >= rst_max_index))
> + return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
> + rst_index = array_index_nospec(rst_index, rst_max_index);
> +
> + desc = rmp_segment_table[rst_index];
> + if (unlikely(!desc))
> return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
>
> - return rmptable + pfn;
> + segment_index = RMP_ENTRY_INDEX(paddr);
> + if (unlikely(segment_index >= desc->max_index))
> + return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
> + segment_index = array_index_nospec(segment_index, desc->max_index);
> +
> + return desc->rmp_entry + segment_index;
> }
>
Ah ok, __get_rmpentry() is finalized here in this patch and rmptable & rmptable_max_pfn
are removed as part of this patch, so probably my comments on patch #1 are not relevant.
This is somewhat confusing, maybe some comments can be added in patch #1 to explain that
__get_rmpentry() will be finalized in this patch ?
My confusion results from the following :
Patch #1:
__get_rmpentry()
--- refers to rmptable.
Patch #5:
rmptable initialized here.
Patch #6:
rmptable not required and removed in this patch.
do final cleanup for __get_rmpentry().
Thanks,
Ashish
> static int get_rmpentry(u64 pfn, struct rmpread *entry)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-25 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-23 18:41 [PATCH v4 0/8] Provide support for RMPREAD and a segmented RMP Tom Lendacky
2024-10-23 18:41 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] x86/sev: Prepare for using the RMPREAD instruction to access the RMP Tom Lendacky
2024-10-25 9:00 ` Kalra, Ashish
2024-10-25 13:39 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-10-25 12:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-10-25 13:47 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-10-25 13:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-10-25 13:56 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-10-25 14:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-10-23 18:41 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] x86/sev: Add support for the RMPREAD instruction Tom Lendacky
2024-10-25 9:25 ` Kalra, Ashish
2024-10-23 18:41 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] x86/sev: Require the RMPREAD instruction after Zen4 Tom Lendacky
2024-10-25 10:47 ` Kalra, Ashish
2024-10-23 18:41 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] x86/sev: Move the SNP probe routine out of the way Tom Lendacky
2024-10-23 18:41 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] x86/sev: Map only the RMP table entries instead of the full RMP range Tom Lendacky
2024-10-25 11:03 ` Kalra, Ashish
2024-10-23 18:42 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] x86/sev: Treat the contiguous RMP table as a single RMP segment Tom Lendacky
2024-10-25 11:51 ` Kalra, Ashish [this message]
2024-10-25 13:43 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-10-23 18:42 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] x86/sev: Add full support for a segmented RMP table Tom Lendacky
2024-10-23 18:42 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] x86/sev/docs: Document the SNP Reverse Map Table (RMP) Tom Lendacky
2024-10-25 7:18 ` Kalra, Ashish
2024-10-25 6:11 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] Provide support for RMPREAD and a segmented RMP Neeraj Upadhyay
2024-10-25 6:38 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=de69eefa-0da3-4142-bcd0-257248c403f1@amd.com \
--to=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®