From: "wanghai (M)" <wanghai26@huawei.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <idosch@mellanox.com>,
<alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>, <tyhicks@canonical.com>,
<f.fainelli@gmail.com>, <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
<amritha.nambiar@intel.com>, <joe@perches.com>,
<dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>, <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net-sysfs: Fix memory leak in netdev_register_kobject
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 21:33:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <de6a274c-a638-9ee8-83bc-b785857f0f0e@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190412132002.GU9224@smile.fi.intel.com>
在 2019/4/12 21:20, Andy Shevchenko 写道:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 06:03:27AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On 04/12/2019 01:36 PM, Wang Hai wrote:
>>> When registering struct net_device, it will call
>>> register_netdevice ->
>>> netdev_register_kobject ->
>>> device_initialize(dev);
>>> dev_set_name(dev, "%s", ndev->name)
>>> device_add(dev)
>>> register_queue_kobjects(ndev)
>>>
>>> In netdev_register_kobject(), if device_add(dev) or
>>> register_queue_kobjects(ndev) failed. Register_netdevice()
>>> will return error, causing netdev_freemem(ndev) to be
>>> called to free net_device, however put_device(&dev->dev)->..->
>>> kobject_cleanup() won't be called, resulting in a memory leak
>>> which is alloced by dev_set_name()
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Having two patches with exact same title is rather confusing for bug trackers.
>>
>> Instead of revert + another_patch, why not just send a cumulative fix ?
> The second patch is a reincarnation of the first version of the fix which has
> been discussed as not a correct approach. But revert should be applied sooner
> as the original commit brought a regression.
Thanks for letting me know. Now should I resend a separate revert, or do
you just review the first patch?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-12 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-12 20:36 [PATCH 0/2] net-sysfs: revert wrong bugfix and re-fix Wang Hai
2019-04-12 20:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "net-sysfs: Fix memory leak in netdev_register_kobject" Wang Hai
2019-04-12 8:38 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-04-15 20:10 ` David Miller
2019-04-12 20:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] net-sysfs: Fix memory leak in netdev_register_kobject Wang Hai
2019-04-12 8:38 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-04-12 12:08 ` wanghai (M)
2019-04-12 12:50 ` Al Viro
2019-04-12 13:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-04-12 13:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-04-12 13:33 ` wanghai (M) [this message]
2019-04-12 13:28 ` wanghai (M)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=de6a274c-a638-9ee8-83bc-b785857f0f0e@huawei.com \
--to=wanghai26@huawei.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=amritha.nambiar@intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=idosch@mellanox.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=tyhicks@canonical.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®