mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
To: Radu Rendec <rrendec@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arch_topology: Pre-allocate cacheinfo from primary CPU
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 14:36:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dea94484-797f-3034-7b86-6d88801c0d91@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230406233926.1670094-1-rrendec@redhat.com>

Hello Radu,
Some additional points:
1-
For the record, Will made a comment about adding weak functions
(cf. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230327121734.GB31342@willie-the-truck/)
but I don't see how it could be done otherwise ...

2-
The patch-set needs to be rebased on top of v6.3-rc6,
otherwise there is a merge conflict.

3-
When trying the patch-set on an ACPI platform with no PPTT, it seems that
fetch_cache_info() is not called from init_cpu_topology() because
parse_acpi_topology() returns an error code. This result in a
'sleeping function called from invalid context' message. The following made
it work for me:

--- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
@@ -838,7 +838,6 @@ void __init init_cpu_topology(void)
                  * don't use partial information.
                  */
                 reset_cpu_topology();
-               return;
         }
  
         for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {

With 2 and 3 addressed:
Reviewed-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>

Also maybe wait for Sudeep to have a look before sending a v4,
Regards,
Pierre


On 4/7/23 01:39, Radu Rendec wrote:
> Commit 5944ce092b97 ("arch_topology: Build cacheinfo from primary CPU")
> tries to build the cacheinfo from the primary CPU prior to secondary
> CPUs boot, if the DT/ACPI description contains cache information.
> However, if such information is not present, it still reverts to the old
> behavior, which allocates the cacheinfo memory on each secondary CPU. On
> RT kernels, this triggers a "BUG: sleeping function called from invalid
> context" because the allocation is done before preemption is first
> enabled on the secondary CPU.
> 
> The solution is to add cache information to DT/ACPI, but at least on
> arm64 systems this can be avoided by leveraging automatic detection
> (through the CLIDR_EL1 register), which is already implemented but
> currently doesn't work on RT kernels for the reason described above.
> 
> This patch series attempts to enable automatic detection for RT kernels
> when no DT/ACPI cache information is available, by pre-allocating
> cacheinfo memory on the primary CPU.
> 
> The first patch adds an architecture independent infrastructure that
> allows architecture specific code to take an early guess at the number
> of cache leaves of the secodary CPUs, while it runs in preemptible
> context on the primary CPU. At the same time, it gives architecture
> specific code the opportunity to go back later, while it runs on the
> secondary CPU, and reallocate the cacheinfo memory if the initial guess
> proves to be wrong.
> 
> The second patch leverages the infrastructure implemented in the first
> patch and enables early cache depth detection for arm64.
> 
> The patch series is based on an RFC patch that was posted to the
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list and discussed with a smaller audience:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230323224242.31142-1-rrendec@redhat.com/
> 
> Changes to v2:
> * Address minor coding style issue (unbalanced braces).
> * Move cacheinfo reallocation logic from detect_cache_attributes() to a
>    new function to improve code readability.
> * Minor fix to cacheinfo reallocation logic to avoid a new detection of
>    the cache level if/when detect_cache_attributes() is called again.
> 
> Radu Rendec (2):
>    cacheinfo: Add arch specific early level initializer
>    cacheinfo: Add arm64 early level initializer implementation
> 
>   arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c | 32 +++++++++++----
>   drivers/base/cacheinfo.c      | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>   include/linux/cacheinfo.h     |  2 +
>   3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-11 12:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-06 23:39 Radu Rendec
2023-04-06 23:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] cacheinfo: Add arch specific early level initializer Radu Rendec
2023-04-12 11:36   ` Sudeep Holla
2023-04-12 13:30     ` Radu Rendec
2023-04-06 23:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] cacheinfo: Add arm64 early level initializer implementation Radu Rendec
2023-04-12 11:40   ` Sudeep Holla
2023-04-12 13:36     ` Radu Rendec
2023-04-11 12:36 ` Pierre Gondois [this message]
2023-04-11 16:36   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] arch_topology: Pre-allocate cacheinfo from primary CPU Radu Rendec

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dea94484-797f-3034-7b86-6d88801c0d91@arm.com \
    --to=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rrendec@redhat.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®