Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/jcore: Use request_percpu_irq()

[Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>]

On 02/09/2024 12:50, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 12:33 PM Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 02/09/2024 12:11, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 11:17 AM Daniel Lezcano
>>> <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 30/07/2024 15:20, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>>>> Use request_percpu_irq() instead of request_irq() to solve
>>>>> the following sparse warning:
>>>>>
>>>>> jcore-pit.c:173:40: warning: incorrect type in argument 5 (different address spaces)
>>>>> jcore-pit.c:173:40:    expected void *dev
>>>>> jcore-pit.c:173:40:    got struct jcore_pit [noderef] __percpu *static [assigned] [toplevel] jcore_pit_percpu
>>>>>
>>>>> Compile tested only.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
>>>>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>>>>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Added Rich Felker in Cc
>>>>
>>>> Applied, thanks
>>>
>>> I think we also need the following patch, since we changed request_irq
>>> to request_percpu_irq:
>>
>> Hmm, I think you are right:
>>
>> I would say it is:
>>
>> static irqreturn_t jcore_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> {
>>           struct jcore_pit *pit = dev_id;
>>
>>          OR
>>
>>          struct jcore_pit *pit = this_cpu_ptr(jcore_pit_percpu);
>>
>>          [ ... ]
>> }
>>
>> The former the better for the encapsulation.
>>
>> Do you mind to update the patch ?
> 
> Done, v2 with changed jcore_timer_interrupt() was just sent.
> 
> Sorry for the inconvenience.

No worries, thanks for the v2

-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog