From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E344EC31E51 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 07:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE88D20673 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 07:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728851AbfFRHDr (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jun 2019 03:03:47 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:18634 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725829AbfFRHDq (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jun 2019 03:03:46 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS405-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 97152D46B26BDBAF397B; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:18:13 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.151.23.176] (10.151.23.176) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:18:05 +0800 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] staging: erofs: decompression inplace approach To: Greg Kroah-Hartman CC: , Miao Xie , , LKML , , Fang Wei , , References: <20190614181619.64905-1-gaoxiang25@huawei.com> <20190617203609.GA22034@kroah.com> <20190618054709.GA4271@kroah.com> From: Gao Xiang Message-ID: Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:18:00 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190618054709.GA4271@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.151.23.176] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/6/18 13:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 09:47:08AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: >> >> >> On 2019/6/18 4:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 02:16:11AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: >>>> At last, this is RFC patch v1, which means it is not suitable for >>>> merging soon... I'm still working on it, testing its stability >>>> these days and hope these patches get merged for 5.3 LTS >>>> (if 5.3 is a LTS version). >>> >>> Why would 5.3 be a LTS kernel? >>> >>> curious as to how you came up with that :) >> >> My personal thought is about one LTS kernel one year... >> Usually 5 versions after the previous kernel...(4.4 -> 4.9 -> 4.14 -> 4.19), >> which is not suitable for all historical LTSs...just prepare for 5.3... > > I try to pick the "last" kernel that is released each year, which > sometimes is 5 kernels, sometimes 4, sometimes 6, depending on the > release cycle. > > So odds are it will be 5.4 for the next LTS kernel, but we will not know > more until it gets closer to release time. Thanks for kindly explanation :) Anyway, I will test these patches, land to our commerical products and try the best efforts on making it more stable for Linux upstream to merge. Thanks, Gao Xiang > > thanks, > > greg k-h >