From: "Andrew Moise" <chops@demiurgestudios.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Frequent RESETs with 2.6.16 megaraid_sas
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 17:12:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <df1ef2450610151412m3ed1570pffc0e26ebab0b874@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
I'm running a 2.6.16 kernel (Debian 2.6.16-18) on a Dell PE 2950,
and I used to get frequent warnings like this under heavy write load:
Oct 2 14:36:01 localhost kernel: sd 0:2:1:0: megasas: RESET -55455 cmd=2a
Oct 2 14:36:01 localhost kernel: megasas: reset successful
Oct 2 14:36:31 localhost kernel: sd 0:2:1:0: megasas: RESET -70369 cmd=2a
Oct 2 14:36:31 localhost kernel: megasas: reset successful
Oct 2 14:37:02 localhost kernel: sd 0:2:1:0: megasas: RESET -83487 cmd=2a
Oct 2 14:37:02 localhost kernel: megasas: reset successful
Oct 2 14:37:32 localhost kernel: sd 0:2:1:0: megasas: RESET -95079 cmd=2a
Oct 2 14:37:32 localhost kernel: megasas: reset successful
Oct 2 14:38:02 localhost kernel: sd 0:2:1:0: megasas: RESET -105361 cmd=2a
Oct 2 14:38:02 localhost kernel: megasas: reset successful
Oct 2 14:38:33 localhost kernel: sd 0:2:1:0: megasas: RESET -115613 cmd=2a
Oct 2 14:38:33 localhost kernel: megasas: reset successful
Oct 2 14:38:33 localhost kernel: sd 0:2:1:0: SCSI error: return code= 0x6000000
Oct 2 14:38:33 localhost kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sdb,
sector 2927091007
Oct 2 14:38:33 localhost kernel: Buffer I/O error on device sdb1,
logical block 731772736
Oct 2 14:38:33 localhost kernel: lost page write due to I/O error on sdb1
Oct 2 14:39:03 localhost kernel: sd 0:2:1:0: megasas: RESET -125667 cmd=2a
Oct 2 14:39:03 localhost kernel: megasas: reset successful
Oct 2 14:39:33 localhost kernel: sd 0:2:1:0: megasas: RESET -135588 cmd=2a
Oct 2 14:39:33 localhost kernel: megasas: [ 0]waiting for 1 commands
to complete
Oct 2 14:39:34 localhost kernel: megasas: reset successful
I saw in some posting that someone with this problem had worked
around it by reducing BLKDEV_MAX_RQ to 8. I did that, and it's been
working well for me for some weeks, but I happened to notice the
following in a recent megaraid patch:
--- linux-2.6.16-2.6.16/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.c
2006-03-20 00:53:29.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc2drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.c
2006-10-13 12:25:04.000000000 -0400
@@ -1716,6 +1823,12 @@
* Get various operational parameters from status register
*/
instance->max_fw_cmds =
instance->instancet->read_fw_status_reg(reg_set) & 0x00FFFF;
+ /*
+ * Reduce the max supported cmds by 1. This is to ensure that the
+ * reply_q_sz (1 more than the max cmd that driver may send)
+ * does not exceed max cmds that the FW can support
+ */
+ instance->max_fw_cmds = instance->max_fw_cmds-1;
instance->max_num_sge =
(instance->instancet->read_fw_status_reg(reg_set) & 0xFF0000) >>
0x10;
/*
I'd prefer to stick with an older, distro-supported kernel, and I'd
also like to avoid importing big recent changes to the megaraid driver
into my production server :-). However, it looks to me like this one
line might be the right fix for the problem that the BLKDEV_MAX_RQ
hack is a workaround for. I'm considering applying it during downtime
in the near future and seeing how it works out.
Would anyone knowledgeable care to comment on the wisdom of this
approach? I won't hold you responsible if my filesystem explodes :-).
I'm just not familiar enough with storage drivers to know if what I'm
considering doing makes sense.
Cheers. Please CC any replies to me, as I'm not on the list. Thanks.
next reply other threads:[~2006-10-15 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-15 21:12 Andrew Moise [this message]
2006-10-16 17:09 Patro, Sumant
2006-10-16 17:34 ` Andrew Moise
2006-10-16 17:50 Patro, Sumant
2006-10-16 18:20 ` Andrew Moise
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=df1ef2450610151412m3ed1570pffc0e26ebab0b874@mail.gmail.com \
--to=chops@demiurgestudios.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®