From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B377C37124 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 02:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF1221019 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 02:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="dhgQktT1"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="dhgQktT1" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726849AbfAVCat (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:30:49 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:59636 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725950AbfAVCat (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:30:49 -0500 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D67D060860; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 02:30:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1548124248; bh=8vbIr5XY0YAd7DNq1WNeC1soeWhLsB0V644Kxzlptlw=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=dhgQktT1KfFjb1pRLXCf/mcfl923JKpnv2fs3BtiZToLKLTklMxQ9qfF/5c5yuKTJ gihx8UiKc+bR2hhxMddM3QuLQ8naiRtTqclRrEDtzfkAyXw5m1Yq7zcgfHgWYww6G+ BNVoTGMr+Tg0oVFA1ua+xfZDjw4upo+O4MgqHKPI= Received: from [10.79.128.187] (blr-bdr-fw-01_globalnat_allzones-outside.qualcomm.com [103.229.18.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: rnayak@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A46FB60712; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 02:30:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1548124248; bh=8vbIr5XY0YAd7DNq1WNeC1soeWhLsB0V644Kxzlptlw=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=dhgQktT1KfFjb1pRLXCf/mcfl923JKpnv2fs3BtiZToLKLTklMxQ9qfF/5c5yuKTJ gihx8UiKc+bR2hhxMddM3QuLQ8naiRtTqclRrEDtzfkAyXw5m1Yq7zcgfHgWYww6G+ BNVoTGMr+Tg0oVFA1ua+xfZDjw4upo+O4MgqHKPI= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org A46FB60712 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=rnayak@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: update config dependencies for QCOM_RPMPD To: Stephen Boyd , andy.gross@linaro.org, david.brown@linaro.org Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@roeck-us.net References: <20190118044801.7312-1-rnayak@codeaurora.org> <154783318835.169631.6614930101893188915@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> From: Rajendra Nayak Message-ID: Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 08:00:44 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <154783318835.169631.6614930101893188915@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/18/2019 11:09 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Rajendra Nayak (2019-01-17 20:48:01) >> drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig >> index a5d5167c3f16..1ee298f6bf17 100644 >> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig >> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ config QCOM_RPMHPD >> >> config QCOM_RPMPD >> bool "Qualcomm RPM Power domain driver" > > Just curious, does it need to be bool for some reason? Here's the link to the discussion around it on the v3 patchset of this series https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/12/111 -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation