From: "André Przywara" <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>, James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
Al Grant <Al.Grant@arm.com>, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/21] perf arm_spe: Fixup top byte for data virtual address
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 15:01:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dfb599fd-b253-ba94-59c0-a76e5043fbb7@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201027030917.15404-11-leo.yan@linaro.org>
On 27/10/2020 03:09, Leo Yan wrote:
> To establish a valid address from the address packet payload and finally
> the address value can be used for parsing data symbol in DSO, current
> code uses 0xff to replace the tag in the top byte of data virtual
> address.
>
> So far the code only fixups top byte for the memory layouts with 4KB
> pages, it misses to support memory layouts with 64KB pages.
>
> This patch adds the conditions for checking bits [55:48] are 0xf0 or
> 0xfd, if detects the patterns it will fill 0xff into the top byte of the
> address, also adds comment to explain the fixing up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> ---
> .../util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.c
> index 776b3e6628bb..e135ac01d94a 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-decoder.c
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
>
> static u64 arm_spe_calc_ip(int index, u64 payload)
> {
> - u64 ns, el;
> + u64 ns, el, val;
>
> /* Instruction virtual address or Branch target address */
> if (index == SPE_ADDR_PKT_HDR_INDEX_INS ||
> @@ -45,8 +45,26 @@ static u64 arm_spe_calc_ip(int index, u64 payload)
> /* Clean tags */
> payload = SPE_ADDR_PKT_ADDR_GET_BYTES_0_6(payload);
>
> - /* Fill highest byte if bits [48..55] is 0xff */
> - if (SPE_ADDR_PKT_ADDR_GET_BYTE_6(payload) == 0xffULL)
> + /*
> + * Armv8 ARM (ARM DDI 0487F.c), chapter "D10.2.1 Address packet"
> + * defines the data virtual address payload format, the top byte
> + * (bits [63:56]) is assigned as top-byte tag; so we only can
> + * retrieve address value from bits [55:0].
> + *
> + * According to Documentation/arm64/memory.rst, if detects the
> + * specific pattern in bits [55:48] of payload which falls in
> + * the kernel space, should fixup the top byte and this allows
> + * perf tool to parse DSO symbol for data address correctly.
> + *
> + * For this reason, if detects the bits [55:48] is one of
> + * following values, will fill 0xff into the top byte:
> + *
> + * - 0xff (for most kernel memory regions);
> + * - 0xf0 (for kernel logical memory map with 64KB pages);
> + * - 0xfd (for kasan shadow region with 64KB pages).
> + */
> + val = SPE_ADDR_PKT_ADDR_GET_BYTE_6(payload);
> + if (val == 0xffULL || val == 0xf0ULL || val == 0xfdULL)
But those values are just the beginning of the region used by the
kernel, aren't they? So the kernel logical map goes from 0xfff000.. to
0xfff7fff..., for instance.
But actually I wonder why were are so selective here? Wouldn't it just
suffice to look at bits [55:52] to be either 0 or F?
Cheers,
Andre
> payload |= 0xffULL << SPE_ADDR_PKT_ADDR_BYTE7_SHIFT;
>
> /* Data access physical address */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-27 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-27 3:08 [PATCH v4 00/21] perf arm-spe: Refactor decoding & dumping flow Leo Yan
2020-10-27 3:08 ` [PATCH v4 01/21] perf arm-spe: Include bitops.h for BIT() macro Leo Yan
2020-10-27 3:08 ` [PATCH v4 02/21] perf arm-spe: Fix a typo in comment Leo Yan
2020-10-27 3:08 ` [PATCH v4 03/21] perf arm-spe: Refactor payload size calculation Leo Yan
2020-10-27 14:53 ` André Przywara
2020-10-27 3:09 ` [PATCH v4 04/21] perf arm-spe: Refactor arm_spe_get_events() Leo Yan
2020-10-27 3:09 ` [PATCH v4 05/21] perf arm-spe: Fix packet length handling Leo Yan
2020-10-27 3:09 ` [PATCH v4 06/21] perf arm-spe: Refactor printing string to buffer Leo Yan
2020-10-27 14:31 ` Dave Martin
2020-10-27 14:50 ` Leo Yan
2020-10-27 3:09 ` [PATCH v4 07/21] perf arm-spe: Refactor packet header parsing Leo Yan
2020-10-27 3:09 ` [PATCH v4 08/21] perf arm-spe: Add new function arm_spe_pkt_desc_addr() Leo Yan
2020-10-27 3:09 ` [PATCH v4 09/21] perf arm-spe: Refactor address packet handling Leo Yan
2020-10-27 14:53 ` André Przywara
2020-10-27 3:09 ` [PATCH v4 10/21] perf arm_spe: Fixup top byte for data virtual address Leo Yan
2020-10-27 15:01 ` André Przywara [this message]
2020-10-28 6:49 ` Leo Yan
2020-10-27 3:09 ` [PATCH v4 11/21] perf arm-spe: Refactor context packet handling Leo Yan
2020-10-27 3:09 ` [PATCH v4 12/21] perf arm-spe: Add new function arm_spe_pkt_desc_counter() Leo Yan
2020-10-27 3:09 ` [PATCH v4 13/21] perf arm-spe: Refactor counter packet handling Leo Yan
2020-10-27 14:54 ` André Przywara
2020-10-27 3:09 ` [PATCH v4 14/21] perf arm-spe: Add new function arm_spe_pkt_desc_event() Leo Yan
2020-10-27 3:09 ` [PATCH v4 15/21] perf arm-spe: Refactor event type handling Leo Yan
2020-10-27 3:09 ` [PATCH v4 16/21] perf arm-spe: Remove size condition checking for events Leo Yan
2020-10-27 3:09 ` [PATCH v4 17/21] perf arm-spe: Add new function arm_spe_pkt_desc_op_type() Leo Yan
2020-10-27 3:09 ` [PATCH v4 18/21] perf arm-spe: Refactor operation packet handling Leo Yan
2020-10-27 14:54 ` André Przywara
2020-10-27 3:09 ` [PATCH v4 19/21] perf arm-spe: Add more sub classes for operation packet Leo Yan
2020-10-27 3:09 ` [PATCH v4 20/21] perf arm_spe: Decode memory tagging properties Leo Yan
2020-10-27 3:09 ` [PATCH v4 21/21] perf arm-spe: Add support for ARMv8.3-SPE Leo Yan
2020-10-27 14:54 ` André Przywara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dfb599fd-b253-ba94-59c0-a76e5043fbb7@arm.com \
--to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=Al.Grant@arm.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liwei391@huawei.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®