On 14.11.23 19:16, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
> 
> 
> On 16.10.23 09:28, Juergen Gross wrote:
> 
> Hello Juergen
> 
> 
>> Instead of the IRQ number user the struct irq_info pointer as parameter
>> in the internal pirq related functions. This allows to drop some calls
>> of info_for_irq().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> 
> 
> Looks good, so
> 
> Reviewed-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>
> 
> 
> Just one NIT below ...
> 
> 
> [snip]
> 
>>    
>> -static void pirq_query_unmask(int irq)
>> +static void pirq_query_unmask(struct irq_info *info)
>>    {
>>    	struct physdev_irq_status_query irq_status;
>> -	struct irq_info *info = info_for_irq(irq);
>>    
>>    	BUG_ON(info->type != IRQT_PIRQ);
>>    
>> -	irq_status.irq = pirq_from_irq(irq);
>> +	irq_status.irq = info->u.pirq.pirq;
> 
> 
>    ... what is the reason to open-code pirq_from_irq() here?
> For example, __startup_pirq() continues to use helper in almost the same
> situation ...

Good catch. I'll change that, especially as it allows to remove the BUG_ON()
which is in the helper already.


Juergen