From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: jiucheng.xu@amlogic.com, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: chao@kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jianxin.pan@amlogic.com,
tuan.zhang@amlogic.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix FG GC failure when file in victim is pinned
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 09:46:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dffacd73-ebc2-4f35-9433-d569b48014be@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260620-origin-dev-v1-1-3b2e639e794c@amlogic.com>
On 6/20/26 17:34, Jiucheng Xu via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Jiucheng Xu <jiucheng.xu@amlogic.com>
>
> When continuous write operations occur in the system, BG GC fails to
> work. This leads to large dirty_segments and small free_segments. If
> fallocate() is performed on a pinned file with the allocated space
> exceeding the free_segment, FG_GC reclamation fails.
>
> The reason is that the file corresponding to the block in the victim is
> pinned, causing gc_data_segment() to fail. Since the condition sec_freed
Jiucheng,
pinned file should be aligned to section size, why there is fragmented blocks
of pinfile locates in dirty sections?
> < gc_control->nr_free_secs isn't satisfied, GC stops, resulting in the
> failure of f2fs_fallocate() allocation.
>
> Setting gc_control->nr_free_secs = 1 make FG GC continue searching
> for new victim.
Maybe we can try this instead of changing f2fs_expand_inode_data() logic:
1. call fggc via ioctl or trigger urgent gc via sysfs
2. fallocate on pinfile, goto 1) if it failed
But, anyway, I suspect it's risk, if there is no normal dirty section,
FGGC will try to call f2fs_unpin_all_sections(), then migrate dirty section
which has pinned blocks, that will cause more damage.
Can you please figure out why pinfile is fragmented first...
Thanks,
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiucheng Xu <jiucheng.xu@amlogic.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/file.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> index 8acdd94272a0ced448e0ba21635d702cfec10682..3e49a73bbf3a184a314e97bff9509a66c27eac00 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> @@ -1883,7 +1883,7 @@ static int f2fs_expand_inode_data(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
> .init_gc_type = FG_GC,
> .should_migrate_blocks = false,
> .err_gc_skipped = true,
> - .nr_free_secs = 0 };
> + .nr_free_secs = 1 };
> pgoff_t pg_start, pg_end;
> loff_t new_size;
> loff_t off_end;
>
> ---
> base-commit: b51f606aa323d553d786ed681a213f134dc688d6
> change-id: 20260620-origin-dev-99cdccc83800
>
> Best regards,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-22 1:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-20 9:34 Jiucheng Xu via B4 Relay
2026-06-22 1:46 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2026-06-22 10:40 ` Jiucheng Xu
2026-06-25 7:09 ` Chao Yu
2026-06-26 8:12 ` Jiucheng Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dffacd73-ebc2-4f35-9433-d569b48014be@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jianxin.pan@amlogic.com \
--cc=jiucheng.xu@amlogic.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tuan.zhang@amlogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox