From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, mingo@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/12]: MUTEX: Introduce mutex implementation
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:13:06 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dhowells1134774786@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
This set of patches implements mutexes as an alternative to semaphores where
such more restricted behaviour is appropriate.
There are several changes that might be appropriate to these patches:
(1) Name DECLARE_MUTEX as DEFINE_MUTEX in linux/mutex-*.h
(2) Make mutex_trylock()'s return value consistent with semaphores rather
than everything else.
(3) Drop the testing module (patch 12/12). I'm not sure I've got the plumbing
correct in the master makefile.
Patches to come after Christmas will include sem -> completion conversions and
sem -> mutex conversions.
Merry Christmas!
David
next reply other threads:[~2005-12-16 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-16 23:13 David Howells [this message]
2005-12-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 3/12]: MUTEX: Rename DECLARE_MUTEX for arch/ dir David Howells
2005-12-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 1/12]: MUTEX: Implement mutexes David Howells
2005-12-17 3:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-17 7:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-17 7:55 ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-17 12:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-17 19:21 ` David Howells
2005-12-17 20:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-17 21:44 ` Russell King
2005-12-18 1:29 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-18 2:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-18 4:07 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-18 4:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-18 6:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-18 9:26 ` Russell King
2005-12-18 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-18 19:41 ` James Bottomley
2005-12-18 19:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-19 1:48 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-19 9:27 ` Russell King
2005-12-19 13:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-12-19 15:49 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-19 15:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-18 17:29 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-18 13:38 ` Alan Cox
2005-12-18 17:21 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 2/12]: MUTEX: Provide SWAP-based mutex for FRV David Howells
2005-12-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 6/12]: MUTEX: Rename DECLARE_MUTEX for fs/ dir David Howells
2005-12-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 11/12]: MUTEX: Rename DECLARE_MUTEX for miscellaneous directories David Howells
2005-12-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 5/12]: MUTEX: Rename DECLARE_MUTEX for drivers/ dir, N thru Z David Howells
2005-12-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 9/12]: MUTEX: Rename DECLARE_MUTEX for net/ dir David Howells
2005-12-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 10/12]: MUTEX: Rename DECLARE_MUTEX for sound/ dir David Howells
2005-12-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 4/12]: MUTEX: Rename DECLARE_MUTEX for drivers/ dir, A thru M David Howells
2005-12-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 8/12]: MUTEX: Rename DECLARE_MUTEX for kernel/ dir David Howells
2005-12-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 7/12]: MUTEX: Rename DECLARE_MUTEX for include/asm-*/ dirs David Howells
2005-12-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 12/12]: MUTEX: Provide synchronisation primitive testing module David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dhowells1134774786@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome