From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Shixin Liu <liushixin2@huawei.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 2/3] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Move {pmd/pud}_huge_tests out of CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 20:35:53 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e025c6e2-d7a8-1e5b-5bd3-4695670af58e@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210401022315.2911967-2-liushixin2@huawei.com>
On 4/1/21 7:53 AM, Shixin Liu wrote:
> The functions {pmd/pud}_set_huge and {pmd/pud}_clear_huge is not depend on THP.
s/is not depend/are not dependent/
> But now if we want to test these functions, we have to enable THP. So move
> {pmd/pud}_huge_tests out of CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE.
Please drop the second sentence here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shixin Liu <liushixin2@huawei.com>
> ---
> mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
> index a5c71a94e804..c379bbe42c2a 100644
> --- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
> +++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
> @@ -242,29 +242,6 @@ static void __init pmd_leaf_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
> WARN_ON(!pmd_leaf(pmd));
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
> -static void __init pmd_huge_tests(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
> -{
> - pmd_t pmd;
> -
> - if (!arch_vmap_pmd_supported(prot))
> - return;
> -
> - pr_debug("Validating PMD huge\n");
> - /*
> - * X86 defined pmd_set_huge() verifies that the given
> - * PMD is not a populated non-leaf entry.
> - */
> - WRITE_ONCE(*pmdp, __pmd(0));
> - WARN_ON(!pmd_set_huge(pmdp, __pfn_to_phys(pfn), prot));
> - WARN_ON(!pmd_clear_huge(pmdp));
> - pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp);
> - WARN_ON(!pmd_none(pmd));
> -}
> -#else /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP */
> -static void __init pmd_huge_tests(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
> -#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP */
> -
> static void __init pmd_savedwrite_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
> {
> pmd_t pmd = pfn_pmd(pfn, prot);
> @@ -379,30 +356,6 @@ static void __init pud_leaf_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
> pud = pud_mkhuge(pud);
> WARN_ON(!pud_leaf(pud));
> }
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
> -static void __init pud_huge_tests(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
> -{
> - pud_t pud;
> -
> - if (!arch_vmap_pud_supported(prot))
> - return;
> -
> - pr_debug("Validating PUD huge\n");
> - /*
> - * X86 defined pud_set_huge() verifies that the given
> - * PUD is not a populated non-leaf entry.
> - */
> - WRITE_ONCE(*pudp, __pud(0));
> - WARN_ON(!pud_set_huge(pudp, __pfn_to_phys(pfn), prot));
> - WARN_ON(!pud_clear_huge(pudp));
> - pud = READ_ONCE(*pudp);
> - WARN_ON(!pud_none(pud));
> -}
> -#else /* !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP */
> -static void __init pud_huge_tests(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
> -#endif /* !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP */
> -
> #else /* !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_PUD */
> static void __init pud_basic_tests(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long pfn, int idx) { }
> static void __init pud_advanced_tests(struct mm_struct *mm,
> @@ -412,9 +365,6 @@ static void __init pud_advanced_tests(struct mm_struct *mm,
> {
> }
> static void __init pud_leaf_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
> -static void __init pud_huge_tests(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
> -{
> -}
> #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_PUD */
> #else /* !CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
> static void __init pmd_basic_tests(unsigned long pfn, int idx) { }
> @@ -433,14 +383,51 @@ static void __init pud_advanced_tests(struct mm_struct *mm,
> }
> static void __init pmd_leaf_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
> static void __init pud_leaf_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
> +static void __init pmd_savedwrite_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
> static void __init pmd_huge_tests(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
> {
> + pmd_t pmd;
> +
> + if (!arch_vmap_pmd_supported(prot))
> + return;
> +
> + pr_debug("Validating PMD huge\n");
> + /*
> + * X86 defined pmd_set_huge() verifies that the given
> + * PMD is not a populated non-leaf entry.
> + */
> + WRITE_ONCE(*pmdp, __pmd(0));
> + WARN_ON(!pmd_set_huge(pmdp, __pfn_to_phys(pfn), prot));
> + WARN_ON(!pmd_clear_huge(pmdp));
> + pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp);
> + WARN_ON(!pmd_none(pmd));
> }
> +
> static void __init pud_huge_tests(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
> {
> + pud_t pud;
> +
> + if (!arch_vmap_pud_supported(prot))
> + return;
> +
> + pr_debug("Validating PUD huge\n");
> + /*
> + * X86 defined pud_set_huge() verifies that the given
> + * PUD is not a populated non-leaf entry.
> + */
> + WRITE_ONCE(*pudp, __pud(0));
> + WARN_ON(!pud_set_huge(pudp, __pfn_to_phys(pfn), prot));
> + WARN_ON(!pud_clear_huge(pudp));
> + pud = READ_ONCE(*pudp);
> + WARN_ON(!pud_none(pud));
> }
> -static void __init pmd_savedwrite_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
> -#endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
> +#else /* !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP */
> +static void __init pmd_huge_tests(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
> +static void __init pud_huge_tests(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP */
>
> static void __init p4d_basic_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
> {
>
This overall does make sense. Will further look into this but later on.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-01 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-01 2:23 [PATCH -next 1/3] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Fix one comment mistake Shixin Liu
2021-04-01 2:23 ` [PATCH -next 2/3] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Move {pmd/pud}_huge_tests out of CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE Shixin Liu
2021-04-01 15:05 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2021-04-01 2:23 ` [PATCH -next 3/3] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Remove useless pfn_pmd() Shixin Liu
2021-04-01 14:41 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-01 14:34 ` [PATCH -next 1/3] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Fix one comment mistake Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e025c6e2-d7a8-1e5b-5bd3-4695670af58e@arm.com \
--to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liushixin2@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®