From: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
To: Tianchu Chen <tianchu.chen@linux.dev>,
sameo@linux.intel.com, shikha.singh@st.com
Cc: oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfc: st95hf: validate device-reported response length before reading
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 01:02:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e026f741-3c19-47b2-b731-f257361e471c@ixit.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91f49a98dd42655829b7206f0d64cc31ef9c0e95@linux.dev>
On 19/08/2026 16:55, Tianchu Chen wrote:
> From: Tianchu Chen <flynnnchen@tencent.com>
>
> st95hf_spi_recv_response() reads a 2-byte header from the device,
> derives the total response length from it (up to 1025 bytes via the
> long-frame encoding) and then blindly reads len - 2 more bytes into
> the caller's buffer, whose size it knows nothing about.
>
> Call sites can be overflowed by a device reporting a large length,
> for example, st95hf_irq_thread_handler() passes the data area of a
> 280-byte skb.
>
> ST95HF datasheet states "In Reader mode it is possible to receive up to
> 528 bytes of frame data from VICC and TypeB cards", so technically a bogus
> NFC tag may trigger the OOB-write if the card-reader's firmware allows
> large packets.
>
> Add a buff_len parameter and reject a device-reported length that does
> not fit into the caller's buffer before issuing the second SPI
> transfer. Also modify callers to pass their real buffer sizes.
>
> Discovered by Atuin - Automated Vulnerability Discovery Engine.
>
> Fixes: cab47333f0f75 ("NFC: Add STMicroelectronics ST95HF driver")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Tianchu Chen <flynnnchen@tencent.com>
> ---
> drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c | 6 ++++--
> drivers/nfc/st95hf/spi.c | 7 ++++++-
> drivers/nfc/st95hf/spi.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
Hello Tianchu,
please check and address the Sashiko output.
Thank you
David
[ ... ]
> @@ -106,6 +106,11 @@ int st95hf_spi_recv_response(struct st95hf_spi_context
*spicontext,
> else
> len += receivebuff[1];
>
> + if (len > buff_len) {
> + mutex_unlock(&spicontext->spi_lock);
> + return -E2BIG;
> + }
> +
Does this early return path leave the spi chip select (CS) permanently
asserted?
The first spi transfer uses .cs_change = 1 to keep the chip select active.
Skipping the second transfer would prevent the chip select from being
deasserted, potentially deadlocking the device.
> /* Now make a transfer to read only relevant bytes */
> tx_takedata.rx_buf = &receivebuff[2];
> tx_takedata.len = len - 2;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-20 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-19 14:55 Tianchu Chen
2026-09-20 23:02 ` David Heidelberg [this message]
2026-09-23 8:20 ` Tianchu Chen
2026-09-23 8:18 ` [PATCH v2] " Tianchu Chen
2026-09-23 9:56 ` David Heidelberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e026f741-3c19-47b2-b731-f257361e471c@ixit.cz \
--to=david@ixit.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=shikha.singh@st.com \
--cc=tianchu.chen@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®