mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Cc: corentin.chary@gmail.com, luke@ljones.dev,
	 Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	 LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] platform/x86: wmi: Check if event data is not NULL
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:31:09 +0200 (EET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e03b600e-6ad2-1dd1-c4af-56ebfce51f12@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240214070433.2677-3-W_Armin@gmx.de>

On Wed, 14 Feb 2024, Armin Wolf wrote:

> WMI event drivers which do not have no_notify_data set expect
> that each WMI event contains valid data. Evaluating _WED however
> might return no data, which can cause issues with such drivers.
> 
> Fix this by validating that evaluating _WED did return data.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c | 11 +++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
> index 34d8f55afaad..8a916887c546 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
> @@ -1211,6 +1211,7 @@ static void wmi_notify_driver(struct wmi_block *wblock)
>  {
>  	struct wmi_driver *driver = drv_to_wdrv(wblock->dev.dev.driver);
>  	struct acpi_buffer data = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
> +	union acpi_object *obj = NULL;
>  	acpi_status status;
> 
>  	if (!driver->no_notify_data) {
> @@ -1219,12 +1220,18 @@ static void wmi_notify_driver(struct wmi_block *wblock)
>  			dev_warn(&wblock->dev.dev, "Failed to get event data\n");
>  			return;
>  		}
> +
> +		obj = data.pointer;
> +		if (!obj) {
> +			dev_warn(&wblock->dev.dev, "Event contains not event data\n");
> +			return;
> +		}
>  	}
> 
>  	if (driver->notify)
> -		driver->notify(&wblock->dev, data.pointer);
> +		driver->notify(&wblock->dev, obj);
> 
> -	kfree(data.pointer);
> +	kfree(obj);

Hi Armin,

While looking into this patch, I failed to connect the mention of 
no_notify_data in the commit message with the code change that does
nothing differently based no_notify_data being set or not, AFAICT.

It could be just that you need to explain things better in the commit 
message, I'm not sure.

-- 
 i.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-15 12:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-14  7:04 [PATCH 0/5] platform/x86: wmi: Fixes for event data handling Armin Wolf
2024-02-14  7:04 ` [PATCH 1/5] platform/x86: wmi: Prevent incompatible event driver from probing Armin Wolf
2024-02-15 12:32   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-02-14  7:04 ` [PATCH 2/5] platform/x86: wmi: Check if event data is not NULL Armin Wolf
2024-02-15 12:31   ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2024-02-15 20:27     ` Armin Wolf
2024-02-19 11:57       ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-02-14  7:04 ` [PATCH 3/5] platform/x86: wmi: Always evaluate _WED when receiving an event Armin Wolf
2024-02-14  7:04 ` [PATCH 4/5] platform/x86: wmi: Update documentation regarding _WED Armin Wolf
2024-02-14  7:04 ` [PATCH 5/5] Revert "platform/x86: asus-wmi: Support WMI event queue" Armin Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e03b600e-6ad2-1dd1-c4af-56ebfce51f12@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=W_Armin@gmx.de \
    --cc=corentin.chary@gmail.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luke@ljones.dev \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome