From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@marvell.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sgoutham@marvell.com, gakula@marvell.com, sbhatta@marvell.com,
hkelam@marvell.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, jerinj@marvell.com, lcherian@marvell.com,
ndabilpuram@marvell.com, sd@queasysnail.net
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v9 6/8] cn10k-ipsec: Process outbound ipsec crypto offload
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 13:48:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e03fbb80-2f44-465b-9152-d85302b9454a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241108045708.1205994-7-bbhushan2@marvell.com>
> @@ -32,6 +33,16 @@ static bool otx2_xdp_rcv_pkt_handler(struct otx2_nic *pfvf,
> struct otx2_cq_queue *cq,
> bool *need_xdp_flush);
>
> +static void otx2_sq_set_sqe_base(struct otx2_snd_queue *sq,
> + struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + if (unlikely(xfrm_offload(skb)))
> + sq->sqe_base = sq->sqe_ring->base + sq->sqe_size +
> + (sq->head * (sq->sqe_size * 2));
Not blocking, but I don't think the unlikely() is appropriate here and
below. Some workloads will definitely see more ipsec encrypted packets
than unencrypted ones.
Perhaps you could protect such checks with a static_branch enabled when
at least a SA is configured.
/P
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-12 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-08 4:57 [net-next PATCH v9 0/8] cn10k-ipsec: Add outbound inline ipsec support Bharat Bhushan
2024-11-08 4:57 ` [net-next PATCH v9 1/8] octeontx2-pf: map skb data as device writeable Bharat Bhushan
2024-11-10 14:23 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-11-11 5:01 ` Bharat Bhushan
2024-11-11 7:15 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-11-11 8:50 ` Bharat Bhushan
2024-11-08 4:57 ` [net-next PATCH v9 2/8] octeontx2-pf: Move skb fragment map/unmap to common code Bharat Bhushan
2024-11-08 4:57 ` [net-next PATCH v9 3/8] octeontx2-af: Disable backpressure between CPT and NIX Bharat Bhushan
2024-11-08 4:57 ` [net-next PATCH v9 4/8] cn10k-ipsec: Init hardware for outbound ipsec crypto offload Bharat Bhushan
2024-11-08 4:57 ` [net-next PATCH v9 5/8] cn10k-ipsec: Add SA add/del support for outb " Bharat Bhushan
2024-11-12 12:41 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-11-15 10:13 ` Bharat Bhushan
2024-11-08 4:57 ` [net-next PATCH v9 6/8] cn10k-ipsec: Process outbound " Bharat Bhushan
2024-11-12 12:48 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2024-11-15 10:16 ` Bharat Bhushan
2024-11-08 4:57 ` [net-next PATCH v9 7/8] cn10k-ipsec: Allow ipsec crypto offload for skb with SA Bharat Bhushan
2024-11-08 4:57 ` [net-next PATCH v9 8/8] cn10k-ipsec: Enable outbound ipsec crypto offload Bharat Bhushan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e03fbb80-2f44-465b-9152-d85302b9454a@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=bbhushan2@marvell.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gakula@marvell.com \
--cc=hkelam@marvell.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sbhatta@marvell.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®