From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E90EC43381 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:36:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B907E21736 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:36:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729787AbfBSWgr (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:36:47 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:43476 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726962AbfBSWgq (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:36:46 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x1JMTUPY100198 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:36:44 -0500 Received: from e16.ny.us.ibm.com (e16.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.206]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2qrs763gsk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:36:44 -0500 Received: from localhost by e16.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:36:44 -0000 Received: from b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.26) by e16.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.203) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:36:42 -0000 Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.110]) by b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x1JMacmd14483688 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:36:38 GMT Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5749AE05C; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:36:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA06AE05F; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:36:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.60.75.235] (unknown [9.60.75.235]) by b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:36:38 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] s390: ap: kvm: setting a hook for PQAP instructions To: pmorel@linux.ibm.com, Cornelia Huck Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, freude@linux.ibm.com, mimu@linux.ibm.com References: <1550152269-6317-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> <1550152269-6317-3-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> <4b21f059-1d37-f341-bac7-5b1fe0d06521@linux.ibm.com> <20190218234235.7d9f547c.cohuck@redhat.com> <74d812c6-bf83-0fb0-8fc3-af1341b0ae3c@linux.ibm.com> From: Tony Krowiak Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:36:38 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <74d812c6-bf83-0fb0-8fc3-af1341b0ae3c@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19021922-0072-0000-0000-000003FC5AC5 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00010628; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000281; SDB=6.01163493; UDB=6.00607510; IPR=6.00944076; MB=3.00025661; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-02-19 22:36:43 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19021922-0073-0000-0000-00004B3C0C17 Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-02-19_15:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=742 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1902190154 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/19/19 2:50 PM, Pierre Morel wrote: > On 18/02/2019 23:42, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 19:29:10 +0100 >> Pierre Morel wrote: >> >>> On 15/02/2019 23:02, Tony Krowiak wrote: >>>> On 2/14/19 8:51 AM, Pierre Morel wrote: >> >>>>> +/* >>>>> + * handle_pqap: Handling pqap interception >>>>> + * @vcpu: the vcpu having issue the pqap instruction >>>>> + * >>>>> + * This callback only handles PQAP/AQIC instruction and >>>>> + * calls a dedicated callback for this instruction if >>>>> + * a driver did register one in the CRYPTO satellite of the >>>>> + * SIE block. >>>>> + * >>>>> + * Do not change the behavior if, return -EOPNOTSUPP if: >>>>> + * - the hook is not used do not change the behavior. >>>>> + * - AP instructions are not available or not available to the guest >>>>> + * - the instruction is not PQAP with function code indicating >>>>> + *   AQIC do not change the previous behavior. >>>>> + * >>>>> + * For PQAP/AQIC instruction, verify privilege and specifications >>>>> + * >>>>> + * return the value returned by the callback. >>>>> + */ >>>>> +static int handle_pqap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >>>>> +{ >>>>> +    uint8_t fc; >>>>> + >>>>> +    /* Verify that the hook callback is registered */ >>>>> +    if (!vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook) >>>>> +        return -EOPNOTSUPP; >>>>> +    /* Verify that the AP instruction are available */ >>>>> +    if (!ap_instructions_available()) >>>>> +        return -EOPNOTSUPP; >>>>> +    /* Verify that the guest is allowed to use AP instructions */ >>>>> +    if (!(vcpu->arch.sie_block->eca & ECA_APIE)) >>>>> +        return -EOPNOTSUPP; >>>>> +    /* Verify that the function code is AQIC */ >>>>> +    fc = vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[0] >> 24; >>>>> +    if (fc != 0x03) >>>>> +        return -EOPNOTSUPP; >>>> >>>> This does not belong here. Function code 3 is one of 7 function codes >>>> that can be sent with the PQAP instruction. This belongs in the PQAP >>>> hook code. >>> >>> On one hand, effectively I would prefer to put the code in the VFIO >>> driver code. >>> On the other hand, doing this would lead to export the code for >>> test_kvm_facility() and kvm_s390_inject_program_int() from the >>> kvm-s390.h >>> >>> I choose not to export these functions from the KVM code. >>> >>> Would like opinion from KVM maintainers? >> >> Looking at this (and without access to the specification...), I think >> the check for problem state makes sense in here (if this applies to all >> PQAP functions equally, which seems likely). The check for the facility >> makes more sense in the handler. You can probably still inject the >> specification exception here if you use a clever return code. >> > > If there is no objection on exporting the KVM functions... I can do this. I do not understand why you would have to export KVM functions to place the check for FC 0x03 in the pqap hook? What am I missing here? Maybe you misunderstood my comment? The following is the only code I suggested you move: + fc = vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[0] >> 24; + if (fc != 0x03) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; What does that have to do with test_kvm_facility() and kvm_s390_inject_program_int()? Please explain. > >> Another option: Provide a way to register a callback per function code; >> this allows you to still do the check here and extend it later for >> other function codes (which will probably be indicated by another >> facility). > > I like this option even better. > > Regards, > Pierre > >