From: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Adithya Jayachandran <ajayachandra@nvidia.com>,
Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Josh Hilke <jrhilke@google.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>, William Tu <witu@nvidia.com>,
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
"yanjun.zhu@linux.dev" <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/12] PCI: liveupdate: Track incoming preserved PCI devices
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 20:31:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e099cbaf-3185-4c39-ae36-7f0e074ebff7@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728221007.2098560-4-dmatlack@google.com>
在 2026/7/28 15:09, David Matlack 写道:
> During PCI enumeration, the previous kernel might have passed state about
> devices that were preserved across kexec. The PCI core needs to fetch
> this state to identify which devices are "incoming" and require special
> handling.
>
> Add pci_liveupdate_setup_device() which is called during device setup
> to fetch the serialized state (struct pci_ser) from the Live Update
> Orchestrator. The first time this happens, pci_flb_retrieve() will run
> and convert the array of pci_dev_ser structs into an xarray so that it
> can be looked up efficiently.
>
> If a device is found in the xarray, the PCI core stores a pointer to its
> state in dev->liveupdate_incoming until pci_liveupdate_finish() is
> called by the driver. This pointer allows the PCI core and drivers to
> apply Live Update-specific logic to incoming devices in subsequent
> commits.
>
> Drivers can check if a device is an incoming preserved device (e.g.
> during probe) by calling pci_liveupdate_is_incoming().
>
> CONFIG_64BIT is now required to enable CONFIG_PCI_LIVEUPDATE so that the
> domain and bdf can be guaranteed to fit in an unsigned long and be used
> as the xarray key.
>
> Reviewed-by: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> drivers/pci/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/pci/liveupdate.c | 256 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/pci/liveupdate.h | 5 +
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 +
> include/linux/pci_liveupdate.h | 13 ++
> 6 files changed, 277 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 9cc7b9291ace..08a724b860dc 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -20834,6 +20834,7 @@ L: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> S: Maintained
> T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/liveupdate/linux.git
> F: drivers/pci/liveupdate.c
> +F: drivers/pci/liveupdate.h
> F: include/linux/kho/abi/pci.h
> F: include/linux/pci_liveupdate.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/Kconfig
> index 3781e2b5f095..8af20f558086 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pci/Kconfig
> @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ config VGA_ARB_MAX_GPUS
>
> config PCI_LIVEUPDATE
> bool "PCI Live Update Support"
> - depends on PCI && LIVEUPDATE
> + depends on PCI && LIVEUPDATE && 64BIT
One question about adding 64BIT to the dependency:
As I understand it, enabling CONFIG_64BIT essentially means that we are
building a 64-bit kernel, and a 32-bit architecture cannot normally
enable CONFIG_64BIT.
If that is the case, would depends on 64BIT be necessary here? Or is PCI
Live Update already inherently restricted to 64-bit architectures by the
existing LIVEUPDATE/architecture configuration, so that this dependency
would be redundant?
If this problem has already discussed, I am very sorry about this.
Yanjun Zhu
> help
> Enable PCI core support for preserving PCI devices across Live
> Update. This, in combination with support in a device's driver,
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/liveupdate.c b/drivers/pci/liveupdate.c
> index b003b7069cdb..5ce5f8b36902 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/liveupdate.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/liveupdate.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,20 @@
> * This allows the PCI core to keep its FLB data (struct pci_ser) up to date
> * with the list of **outgoing** preserved devices for the next kernel.
> *
> + * After kexec, whenever a device is enumerated, the PCI core will check if it
> + * is an **incoming** preserved device (i.e. preserved by the previous kernel)
> + * by checking the incoming FLB data (struct pci_ser).
> + *
> + * Drivers must notify the PCI core when an **incoming** device is done
> + * participating in the incoming Live Update with the following API:
> + *
> + * * ``pci_liveupdate_finish(pci_dev)``
> + *
> + * The PCI core does not enforce any ordering of ``pci_liveupdate_finish()`` and
> + * ``pci_liveupdate_preserve()``. i.e. A PCI device can be **outgoing**
> + * (preserved for next kernel) and **incoming** (preserved by previous kernel)
> + * at the same time.
> + *
> * Restrictions
> * ============
> *
> @@ -100,6 +114,26 @@ struct pci_flb_outgoing {
> struct kho_block_set block_set;
> };
>
> +/**
> + * struct pci_flb_incoming - Incoming PCI FLB object
> + * @ser: The incoming struct pci_ser from the previous kernel.
> + * @xa: Xarray used to quickly lookup devices in @ser.
> + * @block_set: The KHO block set holding the incoming devices.
> + *
> + * This structure holds the runtime state for the incoming PCI Live Update
> + * state. It wraps the serialized pci_ser, the block_set used to restore
> + * the serialized entries, and an xarray for fast lookups.
> + */
> +struct pci_flb_incoming {
> + struct pci_ser *ser;
> + struct xarray xa;
> + struct kho_block_set block_set;
> +};
> +
> +static unsigned long pci_ser_xa_key(u32 domain, u16 bdf)
> +{
> + return (unsigned long)domain << 16 | bdf;
> +}
> static int pci_flb_preserve(struct liveupdate_flb_op_args *args)
> {
> struct pci_flb_outgoing *outgoing __free(kfree) = NULL;
> @@ -140,15 +174,91 @@ static void pci_flb_unpreserve(struct liveupdate_flb_op_args *args)
>
> static int pci_flb_retrieve(struct liveupdate_flb_op_args *args)
> {
> + struct pci_ser *ser = phys_to_virt(args->data);
> + struct pci_flb_incoming *incoming;
> + struct pci_dev_ser *dev_ser;
> + struct kho_block_set_it it;
> + int ret;
> +
> pr_debug("Retrieving struct pci_ser (0x%llx)\n", args->data);
> - args->obj = phys_to_virt(args->data);
> +
> + if (ser->version != PCI_LUO_FLB_VERSION) {
> + pr_err("Incoming PCI FLB version (v%d) is incompatible with this kernel (v%d)\n",
> + ser->version, PCI_LUO_FLB_VERSION);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_restore_free;
> + }
> +
> + incoming = kzalloc_obj(*incoming);
> + if (!incoming) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_restore_free;
> + }
> +
> + incoming->ser = ser;
> + xa_init(&incoming->xa);
> +
> + kho_block_set_init(&incoming->block_set, sizeof(struct pci_dev_ser));
> + ret = kho_block_set_restore(&incoming->block_set, ser->devices);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_free_incoming;
> +
> + kho_block_set_it_init(&it, &incoming->block_set);
> + while ((dev_ser = kho_block_set_it_read_entry(&it))) {
> + unsigned long key;
> +
> + if (!dev_ser->refcount)
> + continue;
> +
> + key = pci_ser_xa_key(dev_ser->domain, dev_ser->bdf);
> + ret = xa_insert(&incoming->xa, key, dev_ser, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_block_set_destroy;
> + }
> +
> + args->obj = incoming;
> return 0;
> +
> +err_block_set_destroy:
> + kho_block_set_destroy(&incoming->block_set);
> +err_free_incoming:
> + xa_destroy(&incoming->xa);
> + kfree(incoming);
> +err_restore_free:
> + kho_restore_free(ser);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void pci_check_all_devices_finished(struct pci_flb_incoming *incoming)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *dev = NULL;
> +
> + if (READ_ONCE(incoming->ser->nr_devices) == 0)
> + return;
> +
> + for_each_pci_dev(dev) {
> + if (READ_ONCE(dev->liveupdate.incoming))
> + pci_emerg(dev, "Preserved device was never finished!\n");
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * This should only happen if a driver violated the contract to call
> + * pci_liveupdate_finish() (something is extremely broken).
> + */
> + panic("Some preserved devices were never finished!\n");
> }
>
> static void pci_flb_finish(struct liveupdate_flb_op_args *args)
> {
> + struct pci_flb_incoming *incoming = args->obj;
> +
> pr_debug("Finished struct pci_ser (0x%llx)\n", args->data);
> - kho_restore_free(args->obj);
> + pci_check_all_devices_finished(incoming);
> +
> + xa_destroy(&incoming->xa);
> + kho_block_set_destroy(&incoming->block_set);
> + kho_restore_free(incoming->ser);
> + kfree(incoming);
> }
>
> static struct liveupdate_flb_ops pci_liveupdate_flb_ops = {
> @@ -325,6 +435,75 @@ void pci_liveupdate_unpreserve(struct pci_dev *dev)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_liveupdate_unpreserve);
>
> +static struct pci_flb_incoming *pci_liveupdate_flb_get_incoming(void)
> +{
> + struct pci_flb_incoming *incoming = NULL;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = liveupdate_flb_get_incoming(&pci_liveupdate_flb, (void **)&incoming);
> +
> + /* Live Update is not enabled. */
> + if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + /* Live Update is enabled, but there is no incoming FLB data. */
> + if (ret == -ENODATA)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + /*
> + * Live Update is enabled and there is incoming FLB data, but none of it
> + * matches pci_liveupdate_flb.compatible.
> + */
> + if (ret == -ENOENT)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + /*
> + * There is incoming FLB data that matches pci_liveupdate_flb.compatible
> + * but retrieve failed (pci_flb_retrieve() returned an error or LUO
> + * failed to acquire a reference to pci_liveupdate_flb_ops.owner).
> + */
> + if (ret)
> + panic("Failed to retrieve incoming FLB data (%d)\n", ret);
> +
> + return incoming;
> +}
> +
> +static void pci_liveupdate_flb_put_incoming(void)
> +{
> + liveupdate_flb_put_incoming(&pci_liveupdate_flb);
> +}
> +
> +void pci_liveupdate_setup_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + struct pci_flb_incoming *incoming;
> + struct pci_dev_ser *dev_ser;
> + unsigned long key;
> +
> + guard(rwsem_write)(&pci_liveupdate.rwsem);
> +
> + incoming = pci_liveupdate_flb_get_incoming();
> + if (!incoming)
> + return;
> +
> + key = pci_ser_xa_key(pci_domain_nr(dev->bus), pci_dev_id(dev));
> + dev_ser = xa_load(&incoming->xa, key);
> +
> + /*
> + * This device was not preserved across Live Update, or it was preserved
> + * but has already been probed and gone through pci_liveupdate_finish(),
> + * e.g. due to removing and re-adding the device. Either way, it's not
> + * treated as incoming-preserved.
> + */
> + if (!dev_ser || !dev_ser->refcount) {
> + pci_liveupdate_flb_put_incoming();
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + pci_info(dev, "Device was preserved by previous kernel across Live Update\n");
> + dev->liveupdate.incoming = dev_ser;
> + pci_liveupdate_flb_put_incoming();
> +}
> +
> void pci_liveupdate_cleanup_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> /*
> @@ -336,7 +515,80 @@ void pci_liveupdate_cleanup_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> */
> if (READ_ONCE(dev->liveupdate.outgoing))
> pci_WARN(dev, 1, "Destroying outgoing-preserved device!\n");
> +
> + if (READ_ONCE(dev->liveupdate.incoming))
> + pci_WARN(dev, 1, "Destroying incoming-preserved device!\n");
> +}
> +
> +static void pci_liveupdate_finish_device(struct pci_ser *ser, struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + if (!dev->liveupdate.incoming) {
> + pci_warn(dev, "Cannot finish preserving an unpreserved device\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (dev->liveupdate.incoming->refcount != 1) {
> + pci_WARN(dev, 1, "Preserved device has a corrupted refcount!\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Drop the refcount so this device does not get treated as an incoming
> + * device again, e.g. in case pci_liveupdate_setup_device() gets called
> + * again because the device is hot-plugged.
> + */
> + dev->liveupdate.incoming->refcount = 0;
> +
> + pci_info(dev, "Device is finished participating in Live Update\n");
> + dev->liveupdate.incoming = NULL;
> + ser->nr_devices--;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * pci_liveupdate_finish() - Finish the preservation of a PCI device
> + * @dev: The PCI device
> + *
> + * pci_liveupdate_finish() notifies the PCI core that a PCI device that was
> + * preserved across the previous Live Update has finished participating in Live
> + * Update. Drivers must call pci_liveupdate_finish() from their struct
> + * liveupdate_file_handler finish() callback to ensure the incoming struct
> + * pci_ser is allocated.
> + */
> +void pci_liveupdate_finish(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + struct pci_flb_incoming *incoming;
> +
> + guard(rwsem_write)(&pci_liveupdate.rwsem);
> +
> + incoming = pci_liveupdate_flb_get_incoming();
> + if (!incoming) {
> + pci_warn(dev, "Cannot finish preserving device without incoming FLB\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + pci_liveupdate_finish_device(incoming->ser, dev);
> + pci_liveupdate_flb_put_incoming();
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_liveupdate_finish);
> +
> +/**
> + * pci_liveupdate_is_incoming() - Check if a device is incoming-preserved
> + * @dev: The PCI device to check
> + *
> + * Check if a device was preserved across Live Update by the previous kernel,
> + * i.e. the device is incoming-preserved. Note that a device is only considered
> + * incoming-preserved prior to pci_liveupdate_finish(). It is up to drivers to
> + * synchronize usage of pci_liveupdate_is_incoming() with their own call to
> + * pci_liveupdate_finish() to avoid acting on stale data.
> + *
> + * Returns: True if the device is incoming-preserved, false otherwise.
> + */
> +bool pci_liveupdate_is_incoming(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + guard(rwsem_read)(&pci_liveupdate.rwsem);
> + return dev->liveupdate.incoming;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_liveupdate_is_incoming);
>
> /**
> * pci_liveupdate_register_flb() - Register a file handler with the PCI core
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/liveupdate.h b/drivers/pci/liveupdate.h
> index b2335581f8d0..eaaa3559fd77 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/liveupdate.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/liveupdate.h
> @@ -11,8 +11,13 @@
> #include <linux/pci.h>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_LIVEUPDATE
> +void pci_liveupdate_setup_device(struct pci_dev *dev);
> void pci_liveupdate_cleanup_device(struct pci_dev *dev);
> #else
> +static inline void pci_liveupdate_setup_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> +}
> +
> static inline void pci_liveupdate_cleanup_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 14b66acbdb15..5dc9d86e3597 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -2065,6 +2065,8 @@ int pci_setup_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> if (pci_early_dump)
> early_dump_pci_device(dev);
>
> + pci_liveupdate_setup_device(dev);
> +
> /* Need to have dev->class ready */
> dev->cfg_size = pci_cfg_space_size(dev);
>
> @@ -2188,6 +2190,7 @@ int pci_setup_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> default: /* unknown header */
> pci_err(dev, "unknown header type %02x, ignoring device\n",
> dev->hdr_type);
> + pci_liveupdate_cleanup_device(dev);
> pci_release_of_node(dev);
> return -EIO;
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci_liveupdate.h b/include/linux/pci_liveupdate.h
> index 894052ad6961..710026ada2d5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci_liveupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci_liveupdate.h
> @@ -16,9 +16,11 @@
> /**
> * struct pci_liveupdate - PCI Live Update state for a struct pci_dev
> * @outgoing: State preserved for the next kernel.
> + * @incoming: State preserved by the previous kernel.
> */
> struct pci_liveupdate {
> struct pci_dev_ser *outgoing;
> + struct pci_dev_ser *incoming;
> };
>
> struct pci_dev;
> @@ -28,6 +30,8 @@ int pci_liveupdate_register_flb(struct liveupdate_file_handler *fh);
> void pci_liveupdate_unregister_flb(struct liveupdate_file_handler *fh);
> int pci_liveupdate_preserve(struct pci_dev *dev);
> void pci_liveupdate_unpreserve(struct pci_dev *dev);
> +void pci_liveupdate_finish(struct pci_dev *dev);
> +bool pci_liveupdate_is_incoming(struct pci_dev *dev);
> #else
> static inline int pci_liveupdate_register_flb(struct liveupdate_file_handler *fh)
> {
> @@ -46,6 +50,15 @@ static inline int pci_liveupdate_preserve(struct pci_dev *dev)
> static inline void pci_liveupdate_unpreserve(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> }
> +
> +static inline void pci_liveupdate_finish(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool pci_liveupdate_is_incoming(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> #endif
>
> #endif /* LINUX_PCI_LIVEUPDATE_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 3:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 22:09 [PATCH v8 00/12] PCI: liveupdate: PCI core support for Live Update David Matlack
2026-07-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v8 01/12] PCI: liveupdate: Set up FLB handler for the PCI core David Matlack
2026-08-17 21:12 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-10 23:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-09-11 16:44 ` David Matlack
2026-07-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v8 02/12] PCI: liveupdate: Track outgoing preserved PCI devices David Matlack
2026-08-24 20:14 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-27 21:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-09-16 3:10 ` Zhu Yanjun
2026-09-16 14:58 ` David Matlack
2026-07-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v8 03/12] PCI: liveupdate: Track incoming " David Matlack
2026-08-24 20:13 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-10 23:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-09-11 16:45 ` David Matlack
2026-09-16 3:31 ` Zhu Yanjun [this message]
2026-09-16 17:28 ` David Matlack
2026-09-16 18:25 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-09-16 18:31 ` David Matlack
2026-09-16 18:58 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-09-16 19:23 ` David Matlack
2026-07-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v8 04/12] PCI: liveupdate: Document driver binding responsibilities David Matlack
2026-09-10 23:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-07-28 22:09 ` [PATCH v8 05/12] PCI: liveupdate: Preserve bus numbers during Live Update David Matlack
2026-09-10 23:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-09-11 18:30 ` David Matlack
2026-09-12 17:31 ` David Matlack
2026-07-28 22:10 ` [PATCH v8 06/12] PCI: liveupdate: Auto-preserve upstream bridges across " David Matlack
2026-08-24 13:41 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-09-10 23:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-09-11 17:00 ` David Matlack
2026-07-28 22:10 ` [PATCH v8 07/12] PCI: Refactor matching logic for pci_dev_acs_ops David Matlack
2026-07-28 22:10 ` [PATCH v8 08/12] PCI: liveupdate: Adopt ACS controls in incoming preserved devices David Matlack
2026-08-24 13:42 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-09-10 23:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-09-11 18:31 ` David Matlack
2026-09-14 16:45 ` David Matlack
2026-07-28 22:10 ` [PATCH v8 09/12] PCI: liveupdate: Adopt ARI Forwarding Enable on preserved bridges David Matlack
2026-08-24 13:43 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-07-28 22:10 ` [PATCH v8 10/12] PCI: liveupdate: Freeze preservation status during shutdown David Matlack
2026-08-24 20:07 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-07-28 22:10 ` [PATCH v8 11/12] PCI: liveupdate: Do not disable bus mastering on preserved devices during kexec David Matlack
2026-08-24 20:02 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-07-28 22:10 ` [PATCH v8 12/12] Documentation: PCI: Add documentation for Live Update David Matlack
2026-08-24 20:01 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-18 17:01 ` [PATCH v8 00/12] PCI: liveupdate: PCI core support " David Matlack
2026-09-10 21:37 ` Pasha Tatashin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e099cbaf-3185-4c39-ae36-7f0e074ebff7@linux.dev \
--to=yanjun.zhu@linux.dev \
--cc=ajayachandra@nvidia.com \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jrhilke@google.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=vipinsh@google.com \
--cc=witu@nvidia.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®