Dear Linux folks, On 12/13/17 14:13, Paul Menzel wrote: > I enabled the undefined behavior sanitizer, and built Linus’ master > branch under Ubuntu 17.10 with gcc (Ubuntu 7.2.0-8ubuntu3) 7.2.0. > > ``` > $ grep UBSAN /boot/config-4.15.0-rc3+ > CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL=y > # CONFIG_ARCH_WANTS_UBSAN_NO_NULL is not set > CONFIG_UBSAN=y > CONFIG_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL=y > # CONFIG_UBSAN_ALIGNMENT is not set > CONFIG_UBSAN_NULL=y > ``` > > Starting the system the messages below are printed. > > ``` > [    0.758899] > ================================================================================ > > [    0.758960] UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in drivers/acpi/sysfs.c:849:33 > [    0.759008] shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long long unsigned int' > [    0.759064] CPU: 2 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc3+ #12 > [    0.759076] Hardware name: Notebook N24_25BU/N24_25BU, BIOS 5.12 07/07/2017 > [    0.759088] Call Trace: > [    0.759118]  ? ftrace_graph_caller+0x98/0x98 > [    0.759133]  dump_stack+0x70/0xae > [    0.759167]  ubsan_epilogue+0x9/0x40 > [    0.759188]  __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x12b/0x170 > [    0.759214]  ? ftrace_graph_caller+0x68/0x98 > [    0.759293]  ? acpi_gpe_apply_masked_gpes+0x50/0xa9 > [    0.759314]  acpi_gpe_apply_masked_gpes+0x50/0xa9 > [    0.759348]  ? ftrace_graph_caller+0x98/0x98 > [    0.759363]  acpi_scan_init+0x145/0x2e4 > [    0.759385]  ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x24/0x24 > [    0.759413]  ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x24/0x24 > [    0.759429]  ? ftrace_graph_caller+0x98/0x98 > [    0.759444]  acpi_init+0x340/0x3a0 > [    0.759500]  ? ftrace_graph_caller+0x98/0x98 > [    0.759515]  do_one_initcall+0x173/0x200 > [    0.759553]  ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x24/0x24 > [    0.759573]  ? do_one_initcall+0x5/0x200 > [    0.759612]  ? ftrace_graph_caller+0x98/0x98 > [    0.759628]  kernel_init_freeable+0x305/0x395 > [    0.759653]  ? rest_init+0xd0/0xd0 > [    0.759689]  kernel_init+0xb/0x119 > [    0.759705]  ? rest_init+0xd0/0xd0 > [    0.759721]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 > [    0.759815] > ================================================================================ > > ``` > > Please tell me, if you need anything else to address this. I created bug #198481 [1], so this is not forgotten about. Kind regards, Paul [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198481