From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444C8C072A2 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 05:54:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344874AbjKQFtK (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Nov 2023 00:49:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45118 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229436AbjKQFtJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Nov 2023 00:49:09 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 863 seconds by postgrey-1.37 at lindbergh.monkeyblade.net; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 21:49:05 PST Received: from mail.oetec.com (mail.oetec.com [108.160.241.186]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A8A21A5; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 21:49:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.35.9] (cpe8c6a8d4d360a-cm8c6a8d4d3608.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.253.151.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.oetec.com (8.17.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 3AH5YCpU064107 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 17 Nov 2023 00:34:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from dclarke@blastwave.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=blastwave.org; s=default; t=1700199254; bh=PvIxctXLgaHgk2d2RaUgrIbNlEUE181R8LoHySAcYCY=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=mI0DHJEA7W0nohOYB1QCRNdDzlCjLAe3aG2MIeeokSWKRVu6WOeUtRALp1qMZCXuC rbDmk12wtHpzrTzieH1101Au1Zg2HgLXX7P8exdi8rgIECqbkwgURnnVgP+sOlokZf /AGCZE5075eMq7qnvuyhihaLl6W7+HBhuEUjApIltaOijvg8O6qUKHB4ELsxLUIOO+ oCZfgKYMl0+KpkVNEYIJuJC32QQ/B+XpZzuqrwDTLOu1NeZbRrN2wSiKBbhDUduE6F hHxEd0zuqut0eLvX8GYH6lSWe3UGjv7yK5M/9+siUly4ZdsIAvsVTOmIrdjH7njsH8 rmZ+xpRJg00uA== Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 00:34:12 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3a_Fwd=3a_sign-file=2ec=3a149=3a17=3a_warning=3a_impli?= =?UTF-8?Q?cit_declaration_of_function_=e2=80=98ENGINE=5fload=5fbuiltin=5fen?= =?UTF-8?B?Z2luZXPigJk=?= Content-Language: en-CA To: Bagas Sanjaya , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Kernel Build System , Linux Kernel Keyrings Cc: David Howells , David Woodhouse , Masahiro Yamada References: <1fca50c4-6d7b-4c9b-bcea-4df17e2c2e7e@gmail.com> From: Dennis Clarke Organization: GENUNIX In-Reply-To: <1fca50c4-6d7b-4c9b-bcea-4df17e2c2e7e@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-oetec-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-oetec-MailScanner-ID: 3AH5YCpU064107 X-oetec-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-oetec-MailScanner-From: dclarke@blastwave.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/16/23 18:41, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > Hi, > > I notice a bug report on Bugzilla [1]. Quoting from it: > >> Not related to https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215750 but I *feel* that >> this code needs a hug. > > See Bugzilla for the full thread. > > AFAIK, this looks like a bug when the kernel is compiled against custom > (non-system) version of OpenSSL library. > I do not know what you could possibly mean. There is nothing "custom" about OpenSSL. For that matter the gcc compiler I am using was also built by me. Works fine. The sign-file.c source compiles fine. It fails to compile in the usual way when trying to build the kernel. Dennis