From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
To: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: dw_mmc: check card present before starting request
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 12:13:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e130d6fa-3fca-9925-603e-8f410cfb0297@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5747C306.7030909@samsung.com>
在 2016/5/27 11:46, Jaehoon Chung 写道:
> Hi Shawn,
>
> On 05/27/2016 12:02 PM, Shawn Lin wrote:
>> The main reason to add this check is to avoid unnecessary
>> mmc_request like the on-going cmd and the corresponding sbc
>> if the card is removed. Although we have already checked this in
>> dw_mci_handle_cd for runtime usage of sd card and dw_mci_init_slot
>> for noremovable devices, but there is a timing gap before it really
>> calls dw_mci_get_cd as mmc_detect_change needs some delay here.
>>
>> Another gain here is that we could save some checkings of card status
>> after sd card been removed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>>
>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> index cb30e91..8eb7898 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ struct idmac_desc {
>> static bool dw_mci_reset(struct dw_mci *host);
>> static bool dw_mci_ctrl_reset(struct dw_mci *host, u32 reset);
>> static int dw_mci_card_busy(struct mmc_host *mmc);
>> +static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc);
>>
>> #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
>> static int dw_mci_req_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
>> @@ -1255,7 +1256,7 @@ static void dw_mci_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
>> */
>> spin_lock_bh(&host->lock);
>>
>> - if (!test_bit(DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT, &slot->flags)) {
>> + if (!dw_mci_get_cd(mmc)) {
>> spin_unlock_bh(&host->lock);
>> mrq->cmd->error = -ENOMEDIUM;
>> mmc_request_done(mmc, mrq);
>
> I think spin_lock/unlock_bh() should be removed at here.
yes, we should hole the lock before dw_mci_queue_request as
dw_mci_get_cd release it, in which state we do the minmum changes
for achieving what we need here.
I will fix it.
> Instead, Can it locate before calling dw_mci_queue_request()?
>
> Anyway, it looks good to me.
>
> Best Regards,
> Jaehoon Chung
>
>>
>
>
>
>
--
Best Regards
Shawn Lin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-27 4:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20160527030403epcas1p48a308b374e994de0e9e80b1b7ff1da10@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2016-05-27 3:02 ` Shawn Lin
2016-05-27 3:46 ` Jaehoon Chung
2016-05-27 4:13 ` Shawn Lin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e130d6fa-3fca-9925-603e-8f410cfb0297@rock-chips.com \
--to=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®