From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>
To: Christopher Lusk <clusk@northecho.dev>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] m68k: Fix seccomp filtering on ColdFire and 68000
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 22:04:06 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e135863e-3057-42ab-9019-bb397ef320e6@linux-m68k.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260913131753.605893-1-clusk@northecho.dev>
Hi Christopher,
On 13/9/26 23:17, Christopher Lusk wrote:
> m68k selects HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER for all configurations, but the
> ColdFire and 68000 syscall entry paths only branch to
> syscall_trace_enter() for TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE. TIF_SECCOMP alone falls
> through to syscall dispatch, leaving installed filters ineffective.
>
> Test the combined TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE and TIF_SECCOMP mask in both paths
> and route either flag through the existing slow path. Leave the classic
> MMU syscall entry implementation unchanged.
>
> Validated the combined test under QEMU mcf5208evb (ColdFire): filters
> denying getpid, openat, unlinkat, and reboot each returned -EPERM. A
> classic-MMU control (q800) denied the filtered getpid syscall both before
> and after this change. The 68000 path shares the same source-level
> omission and receives the identical masked test but was not separately
> emulated. Compile-tested W=1 with CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER=y on both
> m5208evb_defconfig and a custom no-MMU UCSIMM configuration; the latter
> built arch/m68k/68000/entry.o and vmlinux.
>
> Fixes: 6baaade15594 ("m68k: Add kernel seccomp support")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.3+
> Suggested-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.6-sol
> Signed-off-by: Christopher Lusk <clusk@northecho.dev>
Looks good, thanks for the v2. I will push this into the m68knommu git tree,
for-next branch.
Regards
Greg
> ---
>
> Notes:
> Changes in v2:
> - Combine the TRACE/SECCOMP tests into a single masked branch per Andreas
> Schwab; scoped to the ColdFire/68000 paths, classic MMU unchanged.
>
> No in-tree m68k defconfig selects the pure-68000/DragonBall path.
> Compile-tested W=1 with a custom no-MMU UCSIMM configuration and
> CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER=y; arch/m68k/68000/entry.o and vmlinux both built
> successfully. The combined gate uses the same flags byte as the classic-MMU
> entry path.
>
> arch/m68k/68000/entry.S | 3 ++-
> arch/m68k/coldfire/entry.S | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/m68k/68000/entry.S b/arch/m68k/68000/entry.S
> index c257cc415..0d3cbeded 100644
> --- a/arch/m68k/68000/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/m68k/68000/entry.S
> @@ -79,7 +79,8 @@ ENTRY(system_call)
>
> /* Doing a trace ? */
> getthreadinfo
> - btst #(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE%8),%a2@(TINFO_FLAGS+(31-TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)/8)
> + moveb %a2@(TINFO_FLAGS+2),%d1
> + andl #((_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE + _TIF_SECCOMP) >> 8),%d1
> jne do_trace
> cmpl #NR_syscalls,%d0
> jcc badsys
> diff --git a/arch/m68k/coldfire/entry.S b/arch/m68k/coldfire/entry.S
> index 4ea08336e..d658abdc5 100644
> --- a/arch/m68k/coldfire/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/m68k/coldfire/entry.S
> @@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ ENTRY(system_call)
> movel %d2,%a0
> movel %a0@,%a1 /* save top of frame */
> movel %sp,%a1@(TASK_THREAD+THREAD_ESP0)
> - btst #(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE%8),%a0@(TINFO_FLAGS+(31-TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)/8)
> + moveb %a0@(TINFO_FLAGS+2),%d2
> + andl #((_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE + _TIF_SECCOMP) >> 8),%d2
> bnes 1f
>
> movel %d3,%a0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-12 23:06 [PATCH] " Christopher Lusk
2026-09-13 10:01 ` Andreas Schwab
2026-09-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Christopher Lusk
2026-09-23 12:04 ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e135863e-3057-42ab-9019-bb397ef320e6@linux-m68k.org \
--to=gerg@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=clusk@northecho.dev \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=schmitzmic@gmail.com \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®