From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752756AbcI1F7B (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2016 01:59:01 -0400 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.12]:44825 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751633AbcI1F6v (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2016 01:58:51 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] dmaengine: ti drivers: enable COMPILE_TESTing To: Vinod Koul References: <20160921124135.11849-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <20160928032605.GK2467@localhost> CC: , , , , , , From: Peter Ujfalusi Message-ID: Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:58:16 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160928032605.GK2467@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Vinod, On 09/28/16 06:26, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 03:41:26PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Changes since v2: >> - Instead of converting to use enum for the of_device_id data parameter the two >> patch for edma and ti-dma-crossbar is using pointers to u32 variables to make >> sure that the code compile (and in theory work) on all architectures. >> - fixed issue in the ti-dma-crossbar driver I have made with the enum change to >> not handle the DMA offset parameters correctly. >> >> Changes since v1: >> - added the compiler warning message to ti-dma-crossbar enum type patch >> - moved the Kconfig patches at the end of the seris >> >> The following series will enable unconditional COMPILE_TEST coverage for the >> following drivers: omap-dma, edma and ti-dma-crossbar >> >> The series includes fixes noticed when compiling the drivers for x86_64 and >> aarch64. > > I have applied the series after fixing code style nit-picks. > > Also applied the edma patch and reordered the series to have that come > before compile test enable patch > > Please verify. Looks good, thank you! -- Péter