From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3C3C00306 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 15:09:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8702070C for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 15:09:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1567696178; bh=NfBX9KrULy9QnrJyx1vJdGwafFge3XYVRmLdsNYeQxg=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=ScA96rca59fE5St7jW5lnIGkBIKBg+zbOfuVYFiP0KXtLGxBuDWqmwtbzyZ7xDLQR 1eO1829NMN1pp7bRQUv+ciU+zzVBZbFMKCjBj13N07VZUSXivB8biWZuRdVbbeVErn KB1s0CQjCO7h5LpfNmVHQK1G1/9FHn0iRG7iGDbY= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388290AbfIEPJh (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Sep 2019 11:09:37 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:46602 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731401AbfIEPJh (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Sep 2019 11:09:37 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFCD81000; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 08:09:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.197.61] (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1B4B3F67D; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 08:09:35 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: PCI/kernel msi code vs GIC ITS driver conflict? To: John Garry , Andrew Murray Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Bjorn Helgaas , Linux PCI , Linuxarm , "luojiaxing@huawei.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <5fd4c1cf-76c1-4054-3754-549317509310@kernel.org> <20190904102537.GV9720@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <8f1c1fe6-c0d4-1805-b119-6a48a4900e6d@kernel.org> <84f6756f-79f2-2e46-fe44-9a46be69f99d@huawei.com> <651b4d5f-2d86-65dc-1232-580445852752@kernel.org> <8ac8e372-15a0-2f95-089c-c189b619ea62@huawei.com> <73c22eaa-172e-0fba-7a44-381106dee50d@kernel.org> From: Marc Zyngier Organization: Approximate Message-ID: Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 16:09:34 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/09/2019 15:53, John Garry wrote: [...[ >> Awesome. Can I take this as a Tested-by? > > Sure, btw, could you please also add: > > Reported-by: Jiaxing Luo > > ... as he did initial discovery and analysis on the problem. Sure. Now pushed to irqchip-next. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny...