From: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: "axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"jsmart2021@gmail.com" <jsmart2021@gmail.com>,
"bvanassche@acm.org" <bvanassche@acm.org>,
"josef@toxicpanda.com" <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Busch, Keith" <keith.busch@intel.com>,
"hare@suse.de" <hare@suse.de>,
"jthumshirn@suse.de" <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>, "sagi@grimberg.me" <sagi@grimberg.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] blk-mq: change the method of iterating busy tags of a request_queue
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 09:49:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e17f86f0-98ca-5c79-0d9b-43c628b72413@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190315161608.GB15153@localhost.localdomain>
Hi Keith
On 3/16/19 12:16 AM, Keith Busch wrote:
> There is still a window where the check may succeed, but the request is
> being assigned to a completely different request_queue. The callback
> then operates on a request it doesn't own.
>
> Tag iteration from a driver can be safe only if the driver initiates a
> freeze and quiesced all queues sharing the same tagset first. The nvme
> driver does that, but I think there may need to be an additional grace
> period to wait for the allocation's queue_enter to call queue_exit to
> ensure the request is initialized through blk_mq_rq_ctx_init().
This patch is to avoid the use-after-free case in the comment.
The helper interface is used in following cases,
1. in flight request account
this case should not require so much accuracy
2. timeout check
a extra reference will be held there to avoid the request recycle
3. if it is used by driver, it should be enough that quiesce the request_queue
the driver usually wants to handle the in-flight ones, quiesce request_queue
could ensure all of tasks quit the hctx_lock and no one issue request any
more.
Thanks
Jianchao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-18 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-15 8:57 [PATCH 0/8]: blk-mq: use static_rqs to iterate busy tags Jianchao Wang
2019-03-15 8:57 ` [PATCH 1/8] blk-mq: get rid of the synchronize_rcu in __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues Jianchao Wang
2019-03-17 6:14 ` Ming Lei
2019-03-15 8:57 ` [PATCH 2/8] blk-mq: change the method of iterating busy tags of a request_queue Jianchao Wang
2019-03-15 16:16 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-17 6:50 ` Ming Lei
2019-03-18 15:53 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-18 1:49 ` jianchao.wang [this message]
2019-03-20 18:52 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-03-21 1:33 ` jianchao.wang
2019-03-15 8:57 ` [PATCH 3/8] blk-mq: use blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter in debugfs Jianchao Wang
2019-03-15 8:57 ` [PATCH 4/8] mtip32xx: use blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter Jianchao Wang
2019-03-15 8:57 ` [PATCH 5/8] nbd: " Jianchao Wang
2019-03-18 17:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-19 2:04 ` jianchao.wang
2019-03-15 8:57 ` [PATCH 6/8] skd: " Jianchao Wang
2019-03-18 17:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-19 1:54 ` jianchao.wang
2019-03-15 8:57 ` [PATCH 7/8] nvme: " Jianchao Wang
2019-03-15 16:33 ` James Smart
2019-03-15 16:39 ` James Smart
2019-03-15 16:49 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-03-18 7:00 ` jianchao.wang
2019-03-15 8:57 ` [PATCH 8/8] blk-mq: remove blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter Jianchao Wang
2019-03-15 9:20 ` [PATCH 0/8]: blk-mq: use static_rqs to iterate busy tags Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-15 9:44 ` jianchao.wang
2019-03-15 16:19 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-18 2:47 ` jianchao.wang
2019-03-15 13:30 ` Josef Bacik
2019-03-18 17:28 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-19 1:25 ` jianchao.wang
2019-03-19 15:10 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-19 15:25 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-20 18:38 ` Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e17f86f0-98ca-5c79-0d9b-43c628b72413@oracle.com \
--to=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=jsmart2021@gmail.com \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®