From: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@mentor.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Cc: <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dma: imx-sdma: add 1ms delay to ensure SDMA channel is stopped
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:30:19 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e1cd4749-7c66-b918-abc5-7f9e24cd2ff0@mentor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170213020530.GI2843@localhost>
Hello Vinod
On 02/13/2017 11:05 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 06:46:45AM -0800, jiada_wang@mentor.com wrote:
>> From: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@mentor.com>
>>
>> sdma_disable_channel() cannot ensure dma is stopped to access
>> module's FIFOs. Maybe SDMA core is running and accessing BD when
>> disable of corresponding channel, this may cause sometimes even
>> after call of .sdma_disable_channel(), SDMA core still be running
>> and accessing module's FIFOs.
>>
>> We should add delay of one BD SDMA cost time, the maximum is 1ms.
>> So that SDMA clients by calling .device_terminate_all can
>> ensure SDMA core has really been stopped.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@mentor.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 10 +++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
>> index d1651a5..7332c40 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
>> @@ -937,6 +937,14 @@ static int sdma_disable_channel(struct dma_chan *chan)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static int sdma_disable_channel_with_delay(struct dma_chan *chan)
>> +{
>> + sdma_disable_channel(chan);
>> + mdelay(1);
>
> what is the gaurantee that 1ms is fine? Shouldn't you poll the bit to see
> channel is disabled properly..
>
I got the information from NXP (freescale) R&D team,
according to them, by write '1' to SDMA_H_STATSTOP, only disables
the related sdma channel (so poll HE bit will indicates the channel has
been disabled),
but it cannot ensure SDMA core stop to access modules' FIFO,
SDMA core may still is running, this is a bug in HW.
regarding if the '1ms' is enough to ensure SDMA core has stopped,
NXP R&D team mentioned:
"we should add some delay of one BD SDMA cost time after disable the
channel bit, the maximum is 1ms"
so I assume 1ms should work for all cases
Thanks,
Jiada
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static void sdma_set_watermarklevel_for_p2p(struct sdma_channel *sdmac)
>> {
>> struct sdma_engine *sdma = sdmac->sdma;
>> @@ -1828,7 +1836,7 @@ static int sdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> sdma->dma_device.device_prep_slave_sg = sdma_prep_slave_sg;
>> sdma->dma_device.device_prep_dma_cyclic = sdma_prep_dma_cyclic;
>> sdma->dma_device.device_config = sdma_config;
>> - sdma->dma_device.device_terminate_all = sdma_disable_channel;
>> + sdma->dma_device.device_terminate_all = sdma_disable_channel_with_delay;
>> sdma->dma_device.src_addr_widths = BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES);
>> sdma->dma_device.dst_addr_widths = BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES);
>> sdma->dma_device.directions = BIT(DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) | BIT(DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-13 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-10 14:46 jiada_wang
2017-02-13 2:05 ` Vinod Koul
2017-02-13 6:30 ` Jiada Wang [this message]
2017-02-13 10:22 ` Vinod Koul
2017-03-01 8:14 ` Jiada Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e1cd4749-7c66-b918-abc5-7f9e24cd2ff0@mentor.com \
--to=jiada_wang@mentor.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®