Re: [PATCH 4/4] ASoC: SDCA: class_function: clear sconfig.bps on PDM data-port terminals

[Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev>]

>>  static int class_function_sdw_add_peripheral(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
>>  					     struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params,
>>  					     struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
>> @@ -133,6 +144,7 @@ static int class_function_sdw_add_peripheral(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream
>>  	struct class_function_drv *drv = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(dai->component);
>>  	struct sdw_stream_runtime *sdw_stream = snd_soc_dai_get_dma_data(dai, substream);
>>  	struct sdw_slave *sdw = dev_to_sdw_dev(drv->dev->parent);
>> +	struct sdca_entity *entity = &drv->function->entities[dai->id];
>>  	struct sdw_stream_config sconfig = {0};
>>  	struct sdw_port_config pconfig = {0};
>>  	int ret;
>> @@ -152,6 +164,9 @@ static int class_function_sdw_add_peripheral(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream
>>  
>>  	pconfig.num = ret;
>>  
>> +	if (class_function_terminal_is_pdm(entity->iot.type))
>> +		sconfig.bps = 0;
> 
> I think this is fine, as you say bps makes no sense for a PDM
> stream but I might need to spend a little more time working out
> how this all propagates through the core. I guess my concern is
> if other drivers don't handle PDM in the same way.

It's a bit odd to rely on bps when we already have a type for the stream
in struct sdw_stream_config:

@type: Stream type PCM, PDM or BPT