From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755698AbeDYQt4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:49:56 -0400 Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com ([141.146.126.79]:42032 "EHLO aserp2130.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754631AbeDYQts (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:49:48 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Rearrange select_task_rq_fair() to optimize it To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Joel Fernandes , Peter Zijlstra , Valentin Schneider , Ingo Molnar , Vincent Guittot , Daniel Lezcano , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Quentin Perret , Joel Fernandes References: <8a34a16da90b9f83ffe60316a074a5e4d05b59b0.1524479666.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <434fa179-7c8f-8a01-a07a-4527521a04c7@arm.com> <20180424104304.GE4064@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <0985e709-0d71-2c08-20a9-7bfb618fb5f2@arm.com> <20180424123523.GF4064@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20180425025111.zn6fwkr4o4d3y52c@vireshk-i7> From: Rohit Jain Message-ID: Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:48:50 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180425025111.zn6fwkr4o4d3y52c@vireshk-i7> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=8874 signatures=668698 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=737 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1804250155 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/24/2018 07:51 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 24-04-18, 15:34, Rohit Jain wrote: >> Including the "unlikely" suggestion and the original patch, as expected >> with a quick hackbench test on a 44 core 2 socket x86 machine causes no >> change in performance. > Want me to include your Tested-by in next version ? > Please feel free to include it. I was not sure if this is too small a test to say tested by.