Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: tegra210-adma: Fix runtime PM imbalance on error

[Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>]

On 22/05/2020 11:57, dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn wrote:
>>
>> On 22/05/2020 08:58, Dinghao Liu wrote:
>>> pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the runtime PM usage counter even
>>> when it returns an error code. Thus a pairing decrement is needed on
>>> the error handling path to keep the counter balanced.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c | 1 +
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c b/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c
>>> index c4ce5dfb149b..803e1f4d5dac 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c
>>> @@ -658,6 +658,7 @@ static int tegra_adma_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *dc)
>>>  
>>>  	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(tdc2dev(tdc));
>>>  	if (ret < 0) {
>>> +		pm_runtime_put_sync(tdc2dev(tdc));
>>>  		free_irq(tdc->irq, tdc);
>>>  		return ret;
>>>  	}
>>>
>>
>>
>> There is another place in probe that needs to be fixed as well. Can you
>> correct this while you are at it?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Jon
>>
>> -- 
>> nvpublic
> 
> Sure. I have sent a patch to fix PM imbalance in tegra_adma_probe().


You should only send one patch to fix both instances as it is the same
driver. It is impossible to figure out that two patches with the same
$subject are different.

Jon

-- 
nvpublic