From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S932490AbcLHPrj (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 8 Dec 2016 10:47:39 -0500
Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:64827 "EHLO mout.web.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752626AbcLHPra (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 8 Dec 2016 10:47:30 -0500
Subject: Re: staging: comedi: usbduxsigma: Split a condition check in
 usbduxsigma_alloc_usb_buffers()
To: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk>
References: <8cddc37d-4529-ada4-ac21-20e09e888d0d@users.sourceforge.net>
 <b50256ca-37c4-622a-fe69-d7419bdda0d4@users.sourceforge.net>
 <45ac6168-19a8-0864-3b69-2d2409e2b44f@mev.co.uk>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Chris Cesare <chris.cesare@gmail.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <e27eda44-c0fe-8891-8c26-29f7d0f83ce5@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 16:46:02 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <45ac6168-19a8-0864-3b69-2d2409e2b44f@mev.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:uwnNF7qT7+6XqWh6HyYvU5HTp/99lZ1WpGa6UixmMBL3bJsj5/d
 tsU1TBWaS5kgO9cbZH+ucw2KCaQ/wY1fxNdFlaLVnAr5Ih5X5IAGMK8Ann4jAIkDs6x7bz1
 3hPifsrU9vUtOiqamO50AXBDhpETgprlksgg5Jd2mb5KEedIz0xY4u//Yn3XU0mJMTOjJcT
 L9lfsnSk+vKN7djLIIu2g==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:TKq2HwkaCkU=:VxoJK2Ggrkk/9HOYztESwb
 s78uJ/eJRi7Ww36JHFSlLzzwpfTNLhjvm9PUG3dPdPJH27e4P2Vj7Wboq0zlYQU1gZ0fgPz72
 LbIZsRorhz7odPSy0LVn5KGo3aNNZX3gsSMNHofGJSjbji0NkepmqzraL9x1KXHlav2M568C8
 dEGkSWdgn0UczJzBBKJ8Lxm6RJg6JYNpAxtyvCR7ighXTQTo/1r9AlF7g1sl19eU7DbzqIzAp
 VYmWt57roUcL8m6hAeGrSZRwdcoP3yVMvrKfKk7xLkV/31UFfF7/9Jn/5GWAuMwxig60cyp4K
 YD31cg2PdkKD6ypNDDxu4f3UQKOVjolbS/pQjtz+r2AnznOO1dOL/6uxtOAddUawIsy91mXXC
 6Db8Lcz9DEXsnFsta+kIA6j71BsdROZiM15mvCIj0q45Et5APUQKeDnsDMRI8tkyGlq3rf8wX
 6BIsTegd6LC8f9Tz12PDrE3Ul5SAEmWm2uahz2tWBWYbboYl/ExdMNPdmWH2gdwIbFKjIObC1
 j5v9DyjpeeZRfEHGBN32wZSvX07HCfT08EbFRC6WkmoZliED7c8EzrjBinFEZIfmv8gkiz5NJ
 a1kBboW3KWJUUmH9WdVRTCZx55g1yAUUeWfS5hrKJMfKAd4wFyRBkUrTEb1GwlTFgHHV3cwQ2
 ehXZez56jtLGP+ZQjmNszRCwBYsTOup140/8WqUxsGdGYp2vFKO9pBQSr1MSZVJWISSst0YG2
 Sba8eqYBOxY9pEUknjG0n30hEExogWOMIMoOxDu6zfszJXRWRXCfrLhuleR8y9arkvqCo686/
 UzXQz2b
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

>> * Reduce memory allocation sizes for two function calls.

Is this implementation detail worth for further considerations?

Regards,
Markus