From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8584AC48BCD for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 00:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6919F61029 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 00:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229993AbhFJAtV (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 20:49:21 -0400 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:47604 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229557AbhFJAtU (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 20:49:20 -0400 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 15A0lIQ2035269; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 19:47:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1623286039; bh=/V9t/npogsGFkO8y3koHA2bVOzUPrE5rQACqM8GfjIk=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ipXoOqzLPmiLUIgFSAryX9nRW7FjVFxPfftIOAJYYgD3E1W6a8uq2AypHMNbjWnNk wnA4UlkLQxeZtapDtHUssqB49cHpNkzu/vyQTTQkDxEiIN+CeR7ecAqf7FqcDVu1Q5 dQTaolKhgOy7z8edllpRB9CC8EGllKyJYyYk2mZA= Received: from DFLE105.ent.ti.com (dfle105.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.26]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 15A0lIA6117845 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 19:47:18 -0500 Received: from DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) by DFLE105.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 19:47:18 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 19:47:18 -0500 Received: from [10.247.25.23] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 15A0lILe012301; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 19:47:18 -0500 Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] net: phy: dp83867: perform soft reset and retain established link To: Andrew Lunn , "Modi, Geet" CC: "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <20210324010006.32576-1-praneeth@ti.com> <404285EC-BBF0-4482-8454-3289C7AF3084@ti.com> <3494dcf6-14ca-be2b-dbf8-dda2e208b70b@ti.com> <5480BEB5-B540-4BB6-AC32-65CB27439270@ti.com> From: "Bajjuri, Praneeth" Message-ID: Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 19:47:18 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew, On 6/1/2021 2:18 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 07:01:04PM +0000, Modi, Geet wrote: >> Hello Andrew, >> >> >> >> Please let me know if you have additional questions/clarifications to approve >> below change request. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> Geet >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Geet Modi >> Date: Friday, May 28, 2021 at 10:10 AM >> To: Andrew Lunn , "Bajjuri, Praneeth" >> Cc: "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , >> "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , >> "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" >> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] net: phy: dp83867: perform >> soft reset and retain established link > > So this all seems to boil down to, it does not matter if it is > acceptable or not, you are going to do it. So please just remove that > part of the comment. It has no value. Sent v2 addressing comment as per your suggestion. Ref: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1444281/ Thanks Praneeth > > Andrew >