mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>
To: "Bill Davidsen" <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: "Chris Snook" <csnook@redhat.com>,
	"Emmanuel Florac" <eflorac@intellique.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:44:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2e108260803280044o1bf41e5q8fd0b00a772b54a4@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47EC173F.4050309@tmr.com>

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> wrote:
> Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>  It means you shouldn't use dd as a benchmark.
> >
> > If you want to benchmark write speed, you should add
> > oflag=direct,dsync to the dd command line. For benchmarking read speed
> > you should specify iflag=direct. Or, even better, you can use xdd with
> > the flags -dio -processlock.
>
>  No, you want your benchmark to measure performance doing what the
>  application does. Do unless you have an application which has been
>  heavily Linux-ized you don't want to measure something unrelated to the
>  application requirements.

A basic fact I learned in science classes: if you measure something,
know very well what you measure and make sure your measurement is
repeatable. But it was some time ago I learned this. Maybe the whole
world changed since I learned that ?

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-28  7:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-25 18:43 Emmanuel Florac
2008-03-25 22:00 ` Chris Snook
2008-03-25 22:09   ` Emmanuel Florac
2008-03-25 22:47   ` Bill Davidsen
2008-03-25 23:13     ` Chris Snook
2008-03-25 23:42       ` Bill Davidsen
2008-03-26  8:05         ` Emmanuel Florac
2008-03-26  8:25           ` "J.A. Magallón"
2008-03-27 21:49             ` Bill Davidsen
2008-03-26 16:51           ` Chris Snook
2008-03-26 16:39         ` Chris Snook
2008-07-16 14:52       ` Pádraig Brady
2008-07-16 18:18         ` Chris Snook
2008-03-26  7:15   ` Bart Van Assche
2008-03-26  7:56     ` Emmanuel Florac
2008-03-27 21:53     ` Bill Davidsen
2008-03-28  7:44       ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2008-03-28 12:04         ` Bill Davidsen
2008-03-25 22:37 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-03-26  8:42 ` Bart Van Assche
2008-03-26 11:07   ` Emmanuel Florac
2008-03-26 11:15     ` Bart Van Assche
2008-03-26 12:36       ` Emmanuel Florac
2008-03-26 13:22         ` Bart Van Assche
2008-03-27 22:03         ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e2e108260803280044o1bf41e5q8fd0b00a772b54a4@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=bart.vanassche@gmail.com \
    --cc=csnook@redhat.com \
    --cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=eflorac@intellique.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome